Paul on Saturday Night Live on Dec 11th. | Page 3 | Paul McCartney | Fab forum

Please consider registering
Guest

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

  

— Match —

   

— Forum Options —

   

Wildcard usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Paul on Saturday Night Live on Dec 11th.
13 December 2010
5.11pm
Joe
Pepperland
Admin
Forum Posts: 3409
Member Since:
31 March 2008
Offline
41

For those who saw it (it's unavailable here in the UK) could you cast your eyes over this and let me know if anything is incorrect or missing?

http://www.beatlesbible.com/20…..ight-live/

Please don't spoil my day; I'm miles away

Can buy me love! Please consider using these links to support the Beatles Bible: Amazon | iTunes

13 December 2010
5.21pm
mithveaen
Sitarday's room
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 4651
Member Since:
1 May 2010
Offline

Joe said:

For those who saw it (it's unavailable here in the UK) could you cast your eyes over this and let me know if anything is incorrect or missing?

http://www.beatlesbible.com/20…..ight-live/


It's fine, but just a little correction : There were 4 musical sequences : Jet, then Band on the Run, and the final one was supposed to be A Day in Life and Give Peace a Chance. But in the final credits, after Paul Rudd said thanks, instead of the SNL typical ending song,  Paul and his band played Get Back which was cut. paul-mccartney
 

BTW Joe, you didn't mention in the news about Paul's Kennedy Center Awards? a-hard-days-night-ringo-12

 

Edit : Get Back was played while the final credits were running.

Here comes the sun….. Scoobie-doobie…… Something in the way she moves…..attracts me like a cauliflower… Bop. Bop, cat bop. Go, Johnny, Go. Beware of Darkness…  I believe in SH...
13 December 2010
5.35pm
Joe
Pepperland
Admin
Forum Posts: 3409
Member Since:
31 March 2008
Offline
43

Thanks for that. I'll make some amendments.

I didn't cover the Kennedy Center thing, no. Been a bit busy lately. Is it a really big deal? It's sometimes hard to gauge these things.

Please don't spoil my day; I'm miles away

Can buy me love! Please consider using these links to support the Beatles Bible: Amazon | iTunes

13 December 2010
6.53pm
RedLennon
Whitewater WI
Ed Sullivan Show
Forum Posts: 197
Member Since:
5 July 2010
Offline
44

robert said:

I only saw the tribute to John segment and Get Back at the end. I'm finding it hard to feel good about Paul's voice at 69 years. I mean for his age he sings great, however, I wonder if he ought to consider a graceful exit from the stage.

I'm a Beatle fan from 1964 – so I've stuck with them all through the years – and still love 'em.

it's just starting to feel a bit awkward – to me.


I know what you mean.  His voice is really wearing out on him.  Yes, he does so good for a 68 year old man, but I do honestly think the end is coming soon.  However, I really hope he has at least one more U.S. tour before he closes the curtain.  I have never seen Paul, and I know that I would dread never being able to see him.

 

It's hard to come with terms that The Beatles are actually human beings whose voices are going to die eventually. 

13 December 2010
7.09pm
mr. Sun king coming together
Nowhere Land
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 6916
Member Since:
19 September 2010
Offline
45

I saw Him in August and His voice sounded fine. I think the road isn't done for his voice and in fact, it sounds better than two years ago

I tried to think of something powerful and moving… and failed.  "You were given a choice between war and dishonor - you chose dishonor, and you shall have war" - Winston Churchill
13 December 2010
7.53pm
mithveaen
Sitarday's room
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 4651
Member Since:
1 May 2010
Offline
46

Joe said:

Thanks for that. I'll make some amendments.

I didn't cover the Kennedy Center thing, no. Been a bit busy lately. Is it a really big deal? It's sometimes hard to gauge these things.


Well actually it's one of the biggest cultural honors in US so far I know.

 

But you're right, Paul getting too many awards reminds me when my sister and I saw Martina Navratilova's winning Wimbledon, my sister said "Another salad bowl for Martina" a-hard-days-night-paul-1

 

*9*

Here comes the sun….. Scoobie-doobie…… Something in the way she moves…..attracts me like a cauliflower… Bop. Bop, cat bop. Go, Johnny, Go. Beware of Darkness…  I believe in SH...
13 December 2010
9.48pm
Zig
The Toppermost of the Poppermost
Moderator



Forum Posts: 3729
Member Since:
14 April 2010
Online
47

robert said:

I only saw the tribute to John segment and Get Back at the end. I'm finding it hard to feel good about Paul's voice at 69 years. I mean for his age he sings great, however, I wonder if he ought to consider a graceful exit from the stage.

I'm a Beatle fan from 1964 – so I've stuck with them all through the years – and still love 'em.

it's just starting to feel a bit awkward – to me.


His voice did not sound great, but to be honest, the sound quality overall was horrible – it usually is on that show. The only time I watch any of SNL is if they have a musical guest that I care to see because, IMHO, the show has not been funny in over 30 years. Unfortunately, the sound coming from the musical act is always horrible.

If he is live in concert, there are many things that can be done to doctor the sound of his voice. That's probably why everyone keeps saying he sounded better on his latest tour. I wrote a while back that when I saw Dylan about 9 years ago, I couldn't tell if he was singing or talking. Either way, it was a thrill just to be breathing the same air he was! That's why, if the chance ever presents itself, I'd go see Paul in a heartbeat – even if it's 9 years from now. I envy all of you who got the chance to see him last summer or will see him for the upcoming X-mas shows.

To the fountain of perpetual mirth, Let it roll for all its worth.

Every Little Thing you buy from Amazon or iTunes will help the Beatles Bible if you use these links: Amazon | iTunes

13 December 2010
9.58pm
mr. Sun king coming together
Nowhere Land
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 6916
Member Since:
19 September 2010
Offline
48

Zig said:

robert said:

I only saw the tribute to John segment and Get Back at the end. I'm finding it hard to feel good about Paul's voice at 69 years. I mean for his age he sings great, however, I wonder if he ought to consider a graceful exit from the stage.

I'm a Beatle fan from 1964 – so I've stuck with them all through the years – and still love 'em.

it's just starting to feel a bit awkward – to me.


His voice did not sound great, but to be honest, the sound quality overall was horrible – it usually is on that show. The only time I watch any of SNL is if they have a musical guest that I care to see because, IMHO, the show has not been funny in over 30 years. Unfortunately, the sound coming from the musical act is always horrible.

If he is live in concert, there are many things that can be done to doctor the sound of his voice. That's probably why everyone keeps saying he sounded better on his latest tour. I wrote a while back that when I saw Dylan about 9 years ago, I couldn't tell if he was singing or talking. Either way, it was a thrill just to be breathing the same air he was! That's why, if the chance ever presents itself, I'd go see Paul in a heartbeat – even if it's 9 years from now. I envy all of you who got the chance to see him last summer or will see him for the upcoming X-mas shows.


He Sounded fine in the Clip Joe Posted in his article, but he sounded better in tour.

 

*9*

I tried to think of something powerful and moving… and failed.  "You were given a choice between war and dishonor - you chose dishonor, and you shall have war" - Winston Churchill
13 December 2010
11.32pm
robert
Hollywood Bowl
Forum Posts: 353
Member Since:
19 April 2010
Offline
49

OK – so here's where I fall of some Christmas lists – I saw Paul live in 1990 at RFK in DC and he was amazing – totally in voice.

 

i saw him again live in 2006 in DC and was shocked at the difference. Ever since I have noticed the deteriotion of his voice over the years. Getting a bit throatier every year.

 

I saw Paul on TV at the White House, at the awards ceremony, on Jimmy Kimmel a coupla nights before SNL and then SNL – I'm not sure how anyone can deny his voice is aging and as with everyone who ages – it's not holding up – it's a pure and simple fact – and it is thrilling to have Paul alive – in any condition.

And I'll repeat compared to other 68 year olds, his voice is great. Again, I only hope he'll exit the stage gracefully.

I love him – always have, always will.

"She looks more like him than I do."
14 December 2010
12.53am
skye
AZ
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2288
Member Since:
13 November 2009
Offline
50

I blame SNL.

Ad hoc, ad loc, and quid pro quo! So little time! So much to know!
14 December 2010
1.06am
mithveaen
Sitarday's room
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 4651
Member Since:
1 May 2010
Offline

robert said:

OK – so here's where I fall of some Christmas lists


Not at all. I think you're very honest to say it. Maybe I love the Beatles too much to find amazing a bad performance. Or I'd take any day Paul's current voice to any other crappy singer that's around.

 

(Skye : I love your signature!!)

Here comes the sun….. Scoobie-doobie…… Something in the way she moves…..attracts me like a cauliflower… Bop. Bop, cat bop. Go, Johnny, Go. Beware of Darkness…  I believe in SH...
14 December 2010
12.13pm
Zig
The Toppermost of the Poppermost
Moderator



Forum Posts: 3729
Member Since:
14 April 2010
Online
52

robert said:

OK – so here's where I fall of some Christmas lists

 


You're still on mine – for whatever that's worth.

I don't think anyone is disagreeing with you. We are pretty much making various degrees of the same point. There's no denying his voice is not what it used to be – neither is mine and I'm 21 years younger than he.

My point was that any small setting such as the ones you mentioned exposes that fact even more. I'd be willing to bet my house that if you saw him in 1990 on TV or any other "close" setting, he would have sounded far worse than he did when you saw him live in DC. That goes for just about anybody, no?

To the fountain of perpetual mirth, Let it roll for all its worth.

Every Little Thing you buy from Amazon or iTunes will help the Beatles Bible if you use these links: Amazon | iTunes

14 December 2010
12.36pm
robert
Hollywood Bowl
Forum Posts: 353
Member Since:
19 April 2010
Offline
53

Well, thanks for the grace from everyone – and I'll be looking for those Christmas gifts!

And I agree that a close setting such as TV will expose any weaknesses even more. And to his credit, his playing is still amazing – if not even getting better (a little better all the time!).

"She looks more like him than I do."
14 December 2010
5.54pm
Joe
Pepperland
Admin
Forum Posts: 3409
Member Since:
31 March 2008
Offline
54

When Paul had trouble recording the lead vocals for Oh! Darling in 1969 he said something to the effect of "When I was younger I could do this in no time at all." *That*'s when the decline began, then.

Please don't spoil my day; I'm miles away

Can buy me love! Please consider using these links to support the Beatles Bible: Amazon | iTunes

14 December 2010
6.00pm
MeanMrsMustard
Nowhere Land
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2776
Member Since:
9 June 2010
Offline
55

mithveaen said:

(Skye : I love your signature!!)


(So do I!)

If I seem to act unkind, it's only me, it's not my mind that is confusing things.

14 December 2010
8.54pm
robert
Hollywood Bowl
Forum Posts: 353
Member Since:
19 April 2010
Offline
56

Joe said:

When Paul had trouble recording the lead vocals for Oh! Darling in 1969 he said something to the effect of "When I was younger I could do this in no time at all." *That*'s when the decline began, then.


good point, Joe. And if that's decline, I'll take it.
"She looks more like him than I do."
14 December 2010
10.49pm
Von Bontee
A Hole In The Road
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2175
Member Since:
14 December 2009
Offline
57

Yeah, I wouldn't have any ill will for anyone who thinks his voice is in decline OR anyone who thinks he's as great as ever.  If you still like the way he sings, more power to you! And if you're disheartened by the deterioration, just accept that it's natural and unavoidable. And think of how great he's been in the past.

One day, a tape-op got a tape on backwards, he went to play it, and it was all "Neeeradno-undowarrroom" and it was "Wow! Sounds Indian!" -- Paul McCartney
14 December 2010
11.49pm
mr. Sun king coming together
Nowhere Land
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 6916
Member Since:
19 September 2010
Offline
58

Von Bontee said:

Yeah, I wouldn't have any ill will for anyone who thinks his voice is in decline OR anyone who thinks he's as great as ever.  If you still like the way he sings, more power to you! And if you're disheartened by the deterioration, just accept that it's natural and unavoidable. And think of how great he's been in the past.


Sanity of The Highest Level. Congrats Von, You are getting an appleapple01
I tried to think of something powerful and moving… and failed.  "You were given a choice between war and dishonor - you chose dishonor, and you shall have war" - Winston Churchill
15 December 2010
2.24am
skye
AZ
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2288
Member Since:
13 November 2009
Offline
59

MeanMrs.Mustard said:

mithveaen said:

(Skye : I love your signature!!)


(So do I!)
 

(Thank you!)

Zig said:

My point was that any small setting such as the ones you mentioned exposes that fact even more. I'd be willing to bet my house that if you saw him in 1990 on TV or any other "close" setting, he would have sounded far worse than he did when you saw him live in DC. That goes for just about anybody, no?


But why? Is it the lack of crowd noise to cover it up? A failure to adapt to a smaller stage's acoustics? Gremlins? a-hard-days-night-ringo-7I can accept that he's old (sigh) and can't hit all of the notes he used to. In my mind the difference between this performance and what I heard in March is a world tour.
Ad hoc, ad loc, and quid pro quo! So little time! So much to know!
15 December 2010
2.24pm
Zig
The Toppermost of the Poppermost
Moderator



Forum Posts: 3729
Member Since:
14 April 2010
Online
60

skye said:

Zig said:

My point was that any small setting such as the ones you mentioned exposes that fact even more. I'd be willing to bet my house that if you saw him in 1990 on TV or any other "close" setting, he would have sounded far worse than he did when you saw him live in DC. That goes for just about anybody, no?


But why? Is it the lack of crowd noise to cover it up? A failure to adapt to a smaller stage's acoustics? Gremlins? a-hard-days-night-ringo-7I can accept that he's old (sigh) and can't hit all of the notes he used to. In my mind the difference between this performance and what I heard in March is a world tour.

To answer your questions – yes, yes and gremlins?!?!

I lean more towards the acoustics. We all know he can't hit those high notes – that's a sad-but-true fact of life. In a large concert setting, you can definitely hear that. However, in a smaller setting without all of the crowd noise and without the sound bouncing around the arena, it is exposed even more. I recall Paul joking around at the White House gig something along the lines of wanting to do regular performances there because the acoustics were so good. I thought, "be careful what you ask for big guy".

Joe's point of Paul kinda losing the ability to hit those notes as far back as the late 60's was kinda depressing wasn't it?

To the fountain of perpetual mirth, Let it roll for all its worth.

Every Little Thing you buy from Amazon or iTunes will help the Beatles Bible if you use these links: Amazon | iTunes

Forum Timezone: Europe/London

Most Users Ever Online: 597

Currently Online: Zig, Expert Textpert, WETSRoosa, MrMoonlight, thisbirdhasflown
57 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

meanmistermustard: 9290

mr. Sun king coming together: 6916

parlance: 4918

mithveaen: 4651

Ahhh Girl: 4552

Zig: 3729

Annadog40: 3679

Mr. Kite: 3295

Ron Nasty: 2974

fabfouremily: 2927

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 87

Members: 2520

Moderators: 4

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 34

Topics: 3186

Posts: 129943

Newest Members: mal evans, Kimbo, Mariana, badbartimus, imabeatlemaniac

Moderators: Ahhh Girl (4552), meanmistermustard (9290), Zig (3729), Joe (3409)

Administrators: Joe (3409), Ellie (1)

Members Birthdays
Today: None
Upcoming: hermajesty