<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>The Beatles Bible - Topic: Naked for You?</title>
	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[The Beatles&#039; songs, albums, photos, places and much more, including a day-by-day guide to their career from 1957 to 1970 and beyond, plus profiles of John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison, Ringo Starr and many others.]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Version 5.2.6</generator>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <item>
        	<title>Linde on Naked for You?</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-4/#p69710</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-4/#p69710</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>The problem for me is not the production of the songs, it's just that most of the songs are pretty weak imo. </p>
<p>Across the Universe: I like the Past Masters version best. I do like the girls' background vocals and the Beatles' backing vocals. But if I had to choose between LIB and Naked I'd go for LIB.</p>
<p>Let it be: I like the orchestra so I prefer it over Naked</p>
<p>I me mine: LIB version. Same story, love the orchestration.</p>
<p>Long and winding road: I think the orchestra adds so much more emotion to it.</p>
<p>Then I also prefer the LIB version of For ...]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 22:39:39 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>parlance on Naked for You?</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-3/#p69701</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-3/#p69701</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong>LongHairedLady said </strong></p>
<p> The only one of the Beatles that would prefer the original these days would have been John, but in my opinion he only liked Spector's style because John disliked his own voice so much and liked masking it.  I wish John had loved his voice for how beautiful it truly was.  <img alt="heart" src="http://www.beatlesbible.com/wp/wp-content/forum-smileys/heart.gif" width="35" /><img alt="a-hard-days-night-john-1" src="http://www.beatlesbible.com/wp/wp-content/forum-smileys/ahdn_john_01.gif" width="35" /><img alt="heart" src="http://www.beatlesbible.com/wp/wp-content/forum-smileys/heart.gif" width="35" /></p>
</blockquote>
<p>And I think it depends on when he was asked and his level of resentment towards Paul. It seems what happened to TLaWR was allowed to happen out of spite.</p>
<p>parlance</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:58:04 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>meanmistermustard on Naked for You?</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-3/#p69652</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-3/#p69652</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Personally I would doubt Ringo cares either way, something along the lines of 'its the Beatles v The Beatles, the music was great when we got past the business'.</p>
<p>George I cant see getting beyond how shit the sessions were for him.</p>
<p>That leaves John and Paul and i'd go for a tie.</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 20:07:39 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>sky090909 on Naked for You?</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-3/#p69648</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-3/#p69648</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I like the different, well more original, approach to Naked, but I'm just lazy and prefer to listen the original more. Its kinda like the Love album. I like the take and I'll listen to it sometimes, but I rather listen to the original. </p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 20:02:44 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>LongHairedLady on Naked for You?</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-3/#p69645</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-3/#p69645</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I have "Naked" on vinyl...  Love LOVE LOVE it.  I have a hard time listening to the originals of "Across the Universe, Let it Be, and Long and Winding Road" now because of it.  I like it without the "wall of sound".  Also "Don't Let Me Down" is a great song.</p>
<p>The only one of the Beatles that would prefer the original these days would have been John, but in my opinion he only liked Spector's style because John disliked his own voice so much and liked masking it.  I wish John had loved his voice for how beautiful it truly ...]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 19:54:25 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>meanmistermustard on Naked for You?</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-3/#p69637</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-3/#p69637</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that they dont pretend that all was cheerful and good at the time of Let It Be, instead they knew how miserable a time it was for all concerned and dont want to let people see that as it doesnt tie in with the wonderful, lovely, joyful, postive Beatle image that Apple protect and project so much.</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 19:07:15 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>AppleScruffJunior on Naked for You?</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-3/#p69628</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-3/#p69628</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Let It Be film release 2013 maybe? Hasn't it already been restored since the Anthology days and I'm hopeful Paul, Ringo, Olivia and Yoko will just release it, it's not like they can brush it under the mat and pretend that everything was good and cheerful near the end of The Beatles</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 18:44:55 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>mja6758 on Naked for You?</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-3/#p69618</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-3/#p69618</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I could be wrong, but I remember an interview with the guys who did it in <em>Mojo </em>or <em>Uncut </em>at the time, and them referring to "flying in" Lennon's vocal from another rooftop take. I took that to mean that they'd lifted just the vocal, rather than edit the two together. I'm not saying I'm right, just the impression I got from that interview with them.</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 16:06:39 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>meanmistermustard on Naked for You?</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-3/#p69616</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-3/#p69616</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="a-hard-days-night-ringo-8" src="http://www.beatlesbible.com/wp/wp-content/forum-smileys/ahdn_ringo_08.gif" width="35" />Didnt they just take the 2 performances and switch to the other when John flubbed? I cant remember.</p>
<p>I very rarely listen to LIBN as i dont think its an improvement on Let It Be or adds anything to the recordings from that time period. There are a couple that are decent - One After 909 &#38; Across The Universe - but for everything else i will go elsewhere.</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 15:46:38 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>mja6758 on Naked for You?</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-3/#p69615</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-3/#p69615</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
<strong>meanmistermustard said </strong><br />
 And nice to see the bullshit continues with phrases like "free of added effects and vocal and instrumental overdubs" and "no other flourishes" (as in the itunes Notes. Sorry but there as just as many edits as Spector added plus there are also overdubs on Let It Be and i think For You Blue.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>And don't forget the vocal fix on <em>Don't Let Me Down</em>, where they created a whole new overdub by flying in Lennon's vocal from another take. I have to admit to not listening to it that often. Give me the original every day, for all its ...]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 15:39:49 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>DrBeatle on Naked for You?</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-3/#p69609</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-3/#p69609</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>For me the worst thing about LIB...Naked are the songs made up of composite takes, which takes away a little from the spirit of the entire endeavor. Ironically I just listened to my CD of this album yesterday afternoon <img class="spSmiley" src="http://www.beatlesbible.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif" alt=":lol:" class="spSmiley" /> </p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 15:21:56 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>meanmistermustard on Naked for You?</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-3/#p69607</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-3/#p69607</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Good to see its on itunes, would be handy if all the albums were available to download and i think we are just waiting for Live At The BBC, would be good to get a few bonus tracks for that.</p>
<p>I presume the extra audio is the 'Fly on the Wall' disc as originally released.</p>
<p>And nice to see the bullshit continues with phrases like "free of added effects and vocal and instrumental overdubs" and "no other flourishes" (as in the itunes Notes. Sorry but there as just as many edits as Spector added plus there are also overdubs on Let It Be and i ...]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 15:15:01 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>parlance on Naked for You?</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-3/#p69606</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-3/#p69606</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>LIB...N's been released on iTunes. The announcement (via Beatlefan on Facebook):</p>
<blockquote><p>
London – April 2, 2013 – The Beatles’ acclaimed 2003 album, Let It Be… Naked, makes its global digital debut today exclusively on the iTunes Store® (www.itunes.com/thebeatles). In addition to the 11-track album, the iTunes LP features all of the original booklet art and liner notes, as well as bonus audio of studio banter captured during The Beatles’ 1969 recording sessions for Let It Be. Music videos for the ‘Naked’ versions of “Get Back” and “Don’t Let Me Down” are also exclusively available on iTunes for download purchase and free ...]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 15:03:07 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>GeorgeTSimpson on Naked for You?</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-3/#p53018</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-3/#p53018</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I've found a german book about the get back sessions and this tells where the naked fly on the wall snippets were recorded. One thing I also like very much about naked is the fly on the wall disc which features very rare songs, child of nature and a get back with slide guitar!, all things must pass sung by all beatles, the all new Because I know you love me so and fancy my chances with you together with many early versions of let it be and abbey road songs whcih sound very good, and it's a good idea ...]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 21:18:15 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>GeorgeTSimpson on Naked for You?</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-3/#p52076</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/naked-for-you/page-3/#p52076</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Oh Thanks, the links helped me very much. I also wanted to say which version of which lib song my favourite is:<br />
Two of Us: Naked, I like that it features no studio chatter<br />
Dig A Pony: Anthology: I like the All I Want Is start<br />
Across The Universe: Wildlife (Past Masters) I miss the girl's and beatles' backround vocals in any other version<br />
I Me Mine: Anthology (I think the longer version on naked becomes a bit boring, and I don't like the orchestra of let it be)<br />
Dig It: Let It Be (There is no other officially released ...]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:00:30 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
</channel>
</rss>