<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>The Beatles Bible - Topic: Let It Be</title>
	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[The Beatles&#039; songs, albums, photos, places and much more, including a day-by-day guide to their career from 1957 to 1970 and beyond, plus profiles of John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison, Ringo Starr and many others.]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Version 5.2.6</generator>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <item>
        	<title>annab93 on Let It Be</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-11/#p58424</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-11/#p58424</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong>Elmore James said </strong><br />
George's happy smile on the album cover automatically makes it a great record.<img class="spSmiley" src="http://cdn2.beatlesbible.com/wp/wp-content/forum-smileys/ahdn_george_06.gif" alt="ahdn_george_06" width="35" /></p>
</blockquote>
<p>I agree! I remember being a little girl and asking my mom who the man with the nice smile was. </p>
<p>George aside, Let It Be is definitely one of my favorite albums. It has some of my favorite songs and it's a go-to album for me, no matter what mood I'm in. <img class="spSmiley" src="http://cdn2.beatlesbible.com/wp/wp-content/forum-smileys/ahdn_john_01.gif" width="35" alt="a-hard-days-night-john-1" /><img class="spSmiley" src="http://cdn2.beatlesbible.com/wp/wp-content/forum-smileys/ahdn_george_08.gif" width="35" alt="ahdn_george_08" /><img class="spSmiley" src="http://cdn2.beatlesbible.com/wp/wp-content/forum-smileys/heart.gif" width="35" alt="heart" /></p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 03:20:56 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Von Bontee on Let It Be</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-11/#p58340</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-11/#p58340</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever seen what that looks like with the colours reversed? It's really weird and creepy and hilarious! Somebody posted it in an old thread somewhere, and speculated (entirely convincingly) that it's the reason a completely different George photo was used for the cover of "...Naked" instead of the plain negative image of the "Let It Be" portraits that the other three have.</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 19:17:29 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Elmore James on Let It Be</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-11/#p58267</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-11/#p58267</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>George's happy smile on the album cover automatically makes it a great record.<img class="spSmiley" src="http://cdn2.beatlesbible.com/wp/wp-content/forum-smileys/ahdn_george_06.gif" width="35" alt="ahdn_george_06" /></p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 01:37:18 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>GeorgeTSimpson on Let It Be</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-11/#p58245</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-11/#p58245</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>There's a difference between the "the long and winding road" version of the anthology documentary and the one of anthology 3. Really you think those versions have a week vocal track. I've always thought that the two things that make the anthology 3 version better than the naked version is the vocal performance and george's lead guitar which is much better in the anthology 3 version than in the naked version</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 17:31:36 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Duke_of_Kirkaldy on Let It Be</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-11/#p58115</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-11/#p58115</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>On top of that, of all the songs they worked on during these sessions, I think all the right ones ended up on the final album (though "Don't Let Me Down" probably should've been included as well).  Let's not forget that the majority of the songs that would end up on <em>Abbey Road</em> were first tried out there, as well as subsequent solo efforts such as John's "Gimme Some Truth," Paul's "Teddy Boy," and George's "All Things Must Pass," "Isn't It a Pity," "Let It Down," and "Hear Me Lord."  Of all these afore-mentioned songs, I think only "Teddy Boy," ...]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 00:59:52 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Beatlenut on Let It Be</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-11/#p58085</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-11/#p58085</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the answers!   I knew the Beatles (or maybe more accurately, Paul) had a great idea with a back-to-basics, live album.  Love the title (<em>Get Back) </em>and<em> </em>album cover -- an updated <em>Please Please Me</em> cover.  Can you imagine if the Beatles had followed through on that original idea?  It would have been an interesting counterpoint to <em>SPLHCB</em><em>.  </em>Oh well<em>, </em><em>Let It Be</em> is still a great album, one of my favorites by the band.  </p>
<div> </div>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 10:15:47 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Duke_of_Kirkaldy on Let It Be</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-11/#p58074</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-11/#p58074</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong>Beatlenut said </strong><br />
I've always been curious why George Martin did not produce <em>Let It Be.  </em>I know the album had a long, complicated history:  bad feelings all around which probably affected the quality of the recordings.   But did he refuse to produce it?  Was he over-ruled?  </p>
<p>Sorry, as big a Beatles fan I am, this is one history I'm not totally familiar with.  Having said that however, I have to say, <em>Let It Be</em> is still a very good album, with some of their best songs.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The basic concept of the <em>Get Back/Let It Be</em> project was to, after a series of increasingly production-heavy albums, ...]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 02:27:12 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>meanmistermustard on Let It Be</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-11/#p57994</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-11/#p57994</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
I've always been curious why George Martin did not produce <em>Let It Be.  </em>I know the album had a long, complicated history:  bad feelings all around which probably affected the quality of the recordings.   But did he refuse to produce it?  Was he over-ruled?  </p>
<p>Sorry, as big a Beatles fan I am, this is one history I'm not totally familiar with.  Having said that however, I have to say, <em>Let It Be</em> is still a very good album, with some of their best songs.  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>I read recently that John told George Martin that he didnt want his "production shit" on it. Another side is that ...]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:05:57 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Beatlenut on Let It Be</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-11/#p57991</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-11/#p57991</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong>mr. Sun king coming together said </strong><br />
Now, here's a question I'm not even sure I know the answer to: If George Martin had done the album, and it had come out (exactly as Let It Be was released) except without the animosity and with Paul's blessing, would it be viewed better? In other words, how much of the dislike of this album is inherently hatred of Phil Spector?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I've always been curious why George Martin did not produce <em>Let It Be.  </em>I know the album had a long, complicated history:  bad feelings all around which probably affected the quality of the recordings.   ...]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 09:41:38 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>GeorgeTSimpson on Let It Be</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-11/#p57616</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-11/#p57616</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>The the long and winding road version in the anthology doc. is a completly different version (paul sings during billy's solo) I really love all versions of that song including spector's the only thing I hate about his production is the orchestra dum-dum after the first "the long and winding road" and the other beginning lines of a verse. In paul's live versions (in which the orchestra is quieter which is good imo) the orchestra starts after "that leads to your door" which is better imo</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:32:32 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Duke_of_Kirkaldy on Let It Be</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-10/#p57595</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-10/#p57595</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Paul has said that he intended "The Long and Winding Road" to be a sort of Ray Charles-style ballad.  Obviously, schmaltzing it up to the extent that it was contradicted this notion.  <img class="spSmiley" src="http://cdn2.beatlesbible.com/wp/wp-content/forum-smileys/ahdn_paul_07.gif" alt="a-hard-days-night-paul-7" width="35" /></p>
<p> </p>
<p>I personally think Paul's vocal on the <em>Let It Be</em> (and <em>Anthology 3</em>) version sounds a bit sickly in its own right.</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 01:20:32 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>annab93 on Let It Be</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-10/#p57593</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-10/#p57593</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong>meanmistermustard said </strong><br />
I know people who only like the Spector version of TLAWR because thats what The Beatles put out on Let It Be and its what they are used to.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>My mom won't let anybody talk when it comes on when we listen to Let It Be. She's obsessed! It's the only one she's used to, like you said.</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 01:02:49 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>meanmistermustard on Let It Be</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-10/#p57592</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-10/#p57592</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I know people who like the Spector version of TLAWR because thats what The Beatles put out on Let It Be and its what they are used to.</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 01:00:46 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>annab93 on Let It Be</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-10/#p57588</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-10/#p57588</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>gotcha! I think the one on the album is beautiful, but I can definitely tell the over-production of it now that I listen to these two versions. It all just depends on what you like in music I guess <img class="spSmiley" src="http://www.beatlesbible.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="spSmiley" /> </p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 00:31:24 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>meanmistermustard on Let It Be</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-10/#p57578</link>
        	<category>Let It Be</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/let-it-be-1/let-it-be-1/page-10/#p57578</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
<strong>annab93 said </strong></p>
<p>...  And I don't know if this will sound dumb but I do have to wonder-why is The Long and Winding Road disliked so much? I'm not a music critic, but I think it sounds just fine. Or is there a better version out there somewhere?</p>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>TLAWR is generally viewed as being too overproduced, slow, and sickly what with the Wall of Sound Spector put on it along with the female choir (not the first female voices on a beatle record tho as is sometimes said to be); George Martins work is said to be more understated, fitting and ...]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2012 18:54:02 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
</channel>
</rss>