Log In
Register
Home
Topic RSS
3.33pm
14 April 2010
Offline
Yeah, that was a long time ago that Amazon posted that generic release date. I was hoping you had seen something more recent.
Thanks anyway.
To the fountain of perpetual mirth, Let it roll for all its worth.
2295 6972
3.41pm
19 September 2010
Offline
I've just spend 7 minutes looking. All the signs appear to be pointing to that date.
4.17pm
14 April 2010
Offline
Other than the generic Amazon listing, what sources say 9/1/11?
Sorry to be so picky, but I really want this thing to come out already. You would think that if a blockbuster book like this was due for release in less than 60 days, it would be plugged everywhere.
I've seen nothing on the web or anywhere else except for that Amazon thing (which I don't believe is accurate).
To the fountain of perpetual mirth, Let it roll for all its worth.
2295 6972
4.52pm
19 September 2010
Offline
Zig said:
I've seen nothing on the web or anywhere else except for that Amazon thing (which I don't believe is accurate).
I'm just as shocked there has been less publicity for this. I'll see if I can find my sources again.
12.24pm
31 March 2008
Offline
I have a press release from the publisher which says 1 September for the UK, but it's a few months old. I need to get back in touch with them to try to get a review copy – if I have any further info I'll let you know.
2.39pm
14 April 2010
Offline
Fantastic, Joe!
Looking forward to the update and/or your review of the book.
To the fountain of perpetual mirth, Let it roll for all its worth.
2295 6972
3.54pm
12 July 2011
Offline
but really… john thought he was chubby.. but i like it. he really did get a lot thinner (compare beatles for sale cover with sgt. pepper cover) Everyone wanted to buy them beer and food and all that back in the early days. Also drugs probably made him thinner.
3.55pm
19 September 2010
Offline
AllyouneedisJohn said:
But really… john thought he was chubby.. but i like it. he really did get a lot thinner (compare beatles for sale cover with sgt. pepper cover) Everyone wanted to buy them beer and food and all that back in the early days. Also drugs probably made him thinner.
He didn't mean fat. He never meant he was fat.
4.09pm
12 July 2011
Offline
In 65 the reporter called him "the fat beatle". maybe he wasnt all "oh my gosh im gaining weight i need to lose it" but lost it.
im sure it made him a bit angry..
-"Imagine, for a moment, a world in which the Beatles had been photographed, in every minute of their existence, by a pack of screaming Eurotrash paparazzi on mopeds – and were also subject to a shrill, constant, daily barrage of comments about how fat their arses were, and how raddled they looked, even though they were only 22. In fact, John Lennon was ONCE referred to as “the fat Beatle”, and was so distraught about it that he semi-retired, retreated to Weybridge, and spent all his time taking acid and eating only corn-flakes." (got that from some article talking about amy winehouse i dont know why that was in there)
Anyways.. i like john '65. thats all i'm sayin.
Ah whatever i like john all the time.
Most Users Ever Online: 597
Currently Online: LongHairedLady
2 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
mr. Sun king coming together: 6972
meanmistermustard: 3438
MeanMrsMustard: 2794
Egroeg Evoli: 1540
vonbontee: 1427
Von Bontee: 1378
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 87
Members: 1685
Moderators: 5
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 3
Forums: 33
Topics: 2400
Posts: 73462
Newest Members: BrettB, Ralphrennick, fartoons, RIGBY, WilliamCampbell
Moderators: Joe (2702), skye (2295), Ellie (1), Zig (2752), mithveaen (4675)
Administrators: Joe (2702)
