Topic RSS
6.56pm
20 September 2011
OfflineI've been thinking a lot about John in the past few weeks, and I've often wondered about this: does anyone else think John might've been bipolar? I'm not saying for sure or anything, and I might have a tendency to overdiagnose things like this, but a lot of things seem to stack up as evidence. He definitely had some serious mood swings, deeply depressive periods ("fat Elvis" period, feeling suicidal in India, etc.) and he obviously had a tendency to self-medicate. Also, in the extended version of his last Rolling Stone interview, he mentioned something about having days where he'd withdraw from Sean more, because he wouldn't be feeling emotionally stable. Just as an amateur, I think there's a reasonable chance he was in fact bipolar. I know this is mainly opinion-based as we'll never really know for sure, but…any thoughts? Sorry about starting such a serious topic, guys, but I've been wondering about this for quite a while now, and I'd like to know if I'm the only one who thinks so or not.
8.33pm
1 May 2010
OfflineI think it's an interesting question. He might have been bipolar.. but honestly I don't know much about this problem to say it.
I think John had a lot of unsolved issues when he was young, and his personality and all the pressure of being a Beatle didn't help at all. Having Paul, George and Ringo helped him but not for long.
8.42pm

19 September 2010
OfflineIn a word… no. The drugs (and the fact he's 25. It doesn't seem uncommon at that age) caused the Fat Elvis period. As for his suicidal period in India, well that's withdrawal. Drugs, and his childhood "issues" are the main issues, but bipolar I doubt.
8.43pm
16 February 2011
OfflineHe might well have been. Although his "symptoms" could fit to a range of different disorders. It's kind of funny that despite his obvious psychiatric issues, no medical treatment (as far as I know, maybe I'm wrong) was offered for him. Well, he did go through his primal scream therapy… I hope it helped him.
9.05pm
1 May 2011
OfflineI dont think he was. Certainly the drugs he took were a massive factor in his state of mind plus the rejection and loss of both parents in his early childhood, dont forget that John had to chose between his mum and dad when very young. There was no space to breath during Beatlemania and to be blunt he married Cynthia mainly down to her falling pregnant and so was trapped in a marriage in Weybridge that even if he wanted to he couldnt be around for. That would all add to changes in state of mind and emotion dependant on current circumstances.
In India along with drug withdrawl John was also trying/battling to decide between staying with Cynthia and Julian or leaving them for Yoko. That also would have been a huge emotional experience.
I would put down the withdrawls from Sean down partly to his return to the music scene after 5 years and the nerves that would have brought, perhaps bringing up fear of rejection again (would the public accept him?). Plus there were rumours that not all was well in his marriage to Yoko (its difficult to know what to believe and what not to in their marriage as both Yoko and John painted idealistic pictures that were simply not all that accurate).
11.05pm
20 September 2011
OfflineThanks for responding, people. I didn't think it was definite, just a possibility. minime, you have a point about John's issues fitting a lot of disorders. sun king and mistermustard, I know the drugs contributed to his mindstate, but I also think his mindstate (and potentially an "addictive personality") caused him to do much more drugs than he would have otherwise. A sort of chicken-and-the-egg thing. The drugs and the psychological problems fed into each other. On a lighter note, meanmistermustard's reference to Cynthia "falling pregnant" cracked me up. I don't think I've ever heard that wording before. It kinda sounds like an illness when you put it that way.
11.52pm
1 May 2011
OfflineDoesnt falling pregnent mean it wasnt planned? There is probably someone out there screaming that thats completely wrong.
I think John being an 'all or nothing' person was a factor. When John found something that 'worked' or was found to be true or opened him up to a new experience he would totally submerse himself in it until doubts crept in. Then he would be very bitter and angry about it til the point when all that passed and he could talk about it kind of calmly.
Its noticable that John vented a lot of anger, bitterness, pain and hurt in the 1970 Rolling Stone interview and then when challenged about it later by George Martin responded with 'did you believe all that? i was stoned'. A lot of the time John acted in the moment and was surprised by how people reacted to it.
I love what Cilla Black said about him "John was a one off. No one has replaced him. He wasnt an angel. He was wonderfully wicked, thats why i loved him".
What all this has to do with anything, who knows.
2.20am
20 September 2011
Offline
I think it's "getting pregnant" usually, I have quite honestly never heard "falling pregnant." As for your point about John being "all or nothing," I see the personality extremes he had as potentially being symptoms of bipolar disorder. Like I said in my first post, this isn't really something any of us can prove or disprove. Just something interesting to discuss.
11.12am
1 May 2011
Offlineseaglass eyes sunny smile said:
I think it's "getting pregnant" usually, I have quite honestly never heard "falling pregnant."
Maybe its a UK thing, its certainly an expression used.
11.43am
20 September 2011
Offlinemeanmistermustard said:
seaglass eyes sunny smile said:
I think it's "getting pregnant" usually, I have quite honestly never heard "falling pregnant."
Maybe its a UK thing, its certainly an expression used.
Oh, are you British? I'm American. That would explain a lot. Sorry!
12.58pm
10 August 2011
OfflineBipolar is to a certain extent a modern term for manic depressive.
Lennon was certainly enthusiastic with every new cause, but I don't know that he was manic; and although he was a tortured soul, I don't know that he was depressive.
But yes, he wasn't "normal" in a statistical sense of the word.
And of course drugs can muddy any mind.
7.06pm
20 September 2011
Offline"Into the Sky with Diamonds" said:
Bipolar is to a certain extent a modern term for manic depressive.
Lennon was certainly enthusiastic with every new cause, but I don't know that he was manic; and although he was a tortured soul, I don't know that he was depressive.
But yes, he wasn't "normal" in a statistical sense of the word.
And of course drugs can muddy any mind.
I was using bipolar as the most current term for that disorder, yes. I do think he was in fact depressive, although the drugs did contribute to that. Manic I'm not quite so sure about. From watching videos of John, I see pretty much on-and-off alot of overactive, extremely energetic behavior, as well as more controlled periods. It seems like this could be him having manic phases, or even some type of hyperactivity disorder, maybe ADHD. (I really do overdiagnose, don't I? Blame it on the fact that I've had the school counselor for homeroom since seventh grade) I'm pretty sure the overly energetic behavior isn't entirely drug-related, because I notice it on later stuff too.
9.35pm
14 April 2010
OfflineI think it's a fair question. Like you say, seaglass eyes, it's opinion based unless we knew what was on his medical history. If not bipolar, maybe passive-aggressive? His turbulent background would certainly bring lesser people to their knees.
BTW, don't ever apologize for bringing up a serious topic. It will help offset my silly ones.
To the fountain of perpetual mirth, Let it roll for all its worth.
2295 6972
11.09pm
20 September 2011
OfflineZig said:
I think it's a fair question. Like you say, seaglass eyes, it's opinion based unless we knew what was on his medical history. If not bipolar, maybe passive-aggressive? His turbulent background would certainly bring lesser people to their knees.
BTW, don't ever apologize for bringing up a serious topic. It will help offset my silly ones.
Part of the reason I love this site is the silly/serious combination….I'm not sure passive-agressiveness is an actual disorder though. Haven't done research on that.
EDIT: "Passive–aggressive behavior, a personality trait, is passive, sometimes obstructionist resistance to following through with expectations in interpersonal or occupational situations. It is a personality trait marked by a pervasive pattern of negative attitudes and passive, usually disavowed, resistance in interpersonal or occupational situations.
It can manifest itself as learned helplessness, procrastination, stubbornness, resentment, sullenness, or deliberate/repeated failure to accomplish requested tasks for which one is (often explicitly) responsible."
From Wikipedia…probably a reliable source, huh?
Also from Wikipedia "In others, it has also been associated with creativity, goal striving, and positive achievements. There is significant evidence to suggest that many people with creative talents have also suffered from some form of bipolar disorder.[4] It is often suggested that creativity and bipolar disorder are linked."
I just remembered something from John's 1980 Playboy interview… "I always was so psychic or intuitive or poetic or whatever you want to call it, that I was always seeing things in a hallucinatory way. It was scary as a child, because there was nobody to relate to. Neither my auntie nor my friends nor anybody could ever see what I did. It was very, very scary and the only contact I had was reading about an Oscar Wilde or a Dylan Thomas or a Vincent van Gogh– all those books that my auntie had that talked about their suffering because of their visions. Because of what they saw, they were tortured by society for trying to express what they were. I saw loneliness." Van Gogh was bipolar. Also, sometimes that disorder manifests in hallucinations. Just a thought.
Sorry, really long edit, but I kept thinking of new things.
12.54pm
9 June 2010
OfflineI don't think so. We all have our ups and downs. John's were more well-publicized because he was famous.
I think he might have just been slightly more extreme than most. As basically everyone before me said, the drugs were probably a big factor.
mr. Sun king coming together said And yes, YouTube comments are stupid. But hilariously so.
11.46am
20 September 2011
Offlinerobert said:
sometimes he was and sometimes he wasn't
alright, that officially doesn't make sense….
4.49pm
9 June 2011
Offline6.48am
11 September 2011
OfflineBetween what I know of John and my fairly extensive experience with friends and other musicians with bipolar disorder, I am inclined to say very, very likely John was bipolar. Very. Actually, there's no doubt in my mind he was. It almost seems silly to me to try to deny it. If you've ever been in a band with a bipolar person who's not getting treatment, a lot of the stories about John during his Beatles days make a lot of sense. There was a lot of behavior that John exhibited, even well before he got into drugs (which IMO was just stereotypical bipolar-type self-medication in his case), which simply isn't normal for someone who doesn't have bipolar disorder, but is terribly normal for someone who does. John's issues with women, his cyclic problems with drugs and alcohol, his hypercritical attitude about his own work and hypersensitivity toward rejection and criticism from others, his bouts of withdrawal and depression, and so on. Someone above mentioned his suicidal ideation while in India–yeah, that's not normal for non-bipolar person who's just gotten clean. Go ask anyone at a Narcotics Anonymous meeting with any experience with sobriety.
And I've even wondered if one of the contributing factors to the Beatles' decision to stop touring was John experiencing longer and more disabling bouts of depression and more erratic moods, which is typical of a bipolar person who is under a lot of stress and pressure for extended periods of time. When I read Paul's recollections about John's behavior during that period, it really sounds to me like they were, either consciously or unconsciously, accommodating John, as often happens with a bipolar person in a close-knit family-like group–things end up revolving around the bipolar person's highs and lows because you're dealing with a sick individual who cannot choose to not be like that. The only ways out of that is to distance yourself from the bipolar person, which the rest of the Beatles eventually did (and even Yoko for a time), or the bipolar person gets treatment, which John never got (at least not for bipolar disorder).
Most Users Ever Online: 597
Currently Online: SatanHimself
4 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
mr. Sun king coming together: 6972
meanmistermustard: 3438
MeanMrsMustard: 2794
Egroeg Evoli: 1540
vonbontee: 1427
Von Bontee: 1378
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 87
Members: 1685
Moderators: 5
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 3
Forums: 33
Topics: 2400
Posts: 73469
Newest Members: BrettB, Ralphrennick, fartoons, RIGBY, WilliamCampbell
Moderators: Joe (2702), skye (2295), Ellie (1), Zig (2752), mithveaen (4675)
Administrators: Joe (2702)
Log In
Register
Home



…..


