22 December 2013
The term 'brothers' ... gets a lot of usage in this thread. If you're a guy and you have brothers... well, I can certainly relate. I have a couple. And we're constantly in each other's nose about something or other. Always finding a fault or getting pissed off at what one said or what the other did. Behind it all, it would be crushing if something were to happen to one of them.
Paul and George, only 8 months (not 9, Sir Paul) difference in age, fast friends because of their interest in music, spending time at each others house and hitchhiking across the country together, long before McCartney met that Lennon boy... They would wind up living together under arduous and sometimes extreme circumstances, with insane pressures. Stressed, when their peers were allowed to blissfully bloom into their adult years. And all the while, searching for an identity that didn't constantly include references to them as a group. Isolated as they were, who could they blame for failing to gain an individual identity, outside of each other?
Yeah. Brothers. It's easy to understand why vast differences in their respective personalities resulted in things dragging on for years and the readily apparent animosity whenever they were in the same room. But when the one died, the other was indeed crushed. Believe it.
This video is nice for it not only contains some great audio from 'The Threatles' sessions, but some great photos as well. For those who are pressed for time and still doubt that George and Paul truly loved each other, check out the image slotted in at the 3:17 mark, still wanna believe that there was animosity between them? Take your heads and "Shake It Up Baby Now!"...:-)
The following people thank Billy Rhythm for this post:...ontherun, meanmistermustard, C.R.A.
3 March 2012
Have to say I honestly believe he did and he enjoyed it. George could be difficult and lovable and witty and cutting and... Well, he was vast! The man contained multitudes as another poet once sort of said.
For every post on this thread hinting at annoyance on George's part, I see three where George is clearly pleased to be there; a genuine joy.
Yes. There was a Paul / George rift. They got over it. We should, too.
I find this thread, and the interview with George therein, particularly insightful with regard to how George viewed Paul later in his far too short life.
(hope I linked that right)
20 August 2013
There was some discussion of this topic in this thread
If John and George were alive today...
I locked that thread and made a post directing people to this thread and one of the John threads for further discussion on the ideas contained in that thread.
The following people thank Ahhh Girl for this post:meanmistermustard
1 May 2011
Note sure where to post this so will place it here (posted the other half of this entry here)
Reading thru part of Keith Badman's book 'The Beatles Diary Volume 2: After The Break-Up 1970 – 2001' came across this excerpt from an entry for October 1992.
In the States, an interview with George, carried out by Bill Flangan, is reprinted in this month's Rock CD magazine. During the feature, George... talks about the Beatles Anthology documentary series, currently in production. "This thing has been laying in cans for years," he reveals. "We did an interview for it and during the course of the questions, this thought came into my mind, which sums up the whole of The Beatles' years: How many Beatles does it take to change a light bulb? The answer is four: John, Paul, George and Ringo. Whatever history thinks, that's what it was." (The interview had previously been printed in the American publication Musician.)
Most Users Ever Online: 597
Currently Online: beatlepedia
Currently Browsing this Page:
mr. Sun king coming together: 6916
Ahhh Girl: 5123
Mr. Kite: 3790
Ron Nasty: 3089
Guest Posters: 88
Newest Members: damianosito1984, Bigbeat, edbeatle, the57thbeatle, BLOODFYEND
Moderators: Ahhh Girl: 5123, meanmistermustard: 9850, Zig: 4192, Joe: 3461
Administrators: Joe: 3461, Ellie: 1