Do you think George really wanted to do the anthology documentary? | Page 2 | George Harrison | Fab forum

Please consider registering
Guest

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

  
 

— Match —

   

— Forum Options —

   

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Do you think George really wanted to do the anthology documentary?
16 November 2013
12.01pm
robert
Hollywood Bowl
Forum Posts: 358
Member Since:
19 April 2010
Offline
21

George is extremely uncomfortable in these takes and I think there's a multitude of reasons - many of which have already been mentioned. But I will add one more reason/opinion. And I say this without necessarily being a major 'Paul fan' at all - nonetheless I offer the following:

Anthology is a story that has an ending - 4 guys who were united broke up in large part due to a business issue (as the immediate catalyst - lots of other issues as well for sure).

In the break up two were firmly united (John and George), one went with the other two (Ringo) and one stood his ground and opposed the other 3 (Paul).

The story ends and Paul was right. Klein was a thief. Apple was getting bilked.  The partnership was dissolved, they each go their own way, Paul's in-laws made him a boat load of money and Paul's solo career (in terms of financial success) dwarfs the other three. And the whole world knows it.

I think for George reviewing the Beatles history is a looking at story with a conclusion - and for him not a good one. It only magnifies Paul's position and diminishes George's. Also remember that from Pepper on pretty much every Beatles project (other than the White Album) was a Paul project.

So a trip down memory lane always ends up in the same place. George's melancholy temperment makes such memories always end bad. Because they Beatles break up was so bitter and so splintering the last year 69-70 dominate the story and so the end point is that Paul was right - about almost all of it - right down to Abbey Road album (heck he even re-did Let It Be).

And please note - I am not talking about music quality, musicianship, song writing, social causes, or anything but the business and the direction of the band.

History is written by the victors and in this case it was Paul. And so for George to have to come to the charitable hand of Paul McCartney is about as distasteful a thing he could do. Add to that no John to keep Paul in check and you get the awkward footage you get.

My 2 cents and over priced at that.

 

 

 

 

 

 

"She looks more like him than I do."
16 November 2013
12.20pm
breatle62
The Jacaranda
Forum Posts: 28
Member Since:
15 November 2013
Offline
22

Even though george looked like he didnt want too be thier,i still relished every moment of the anthology.My favorite scene was when they all got outta georges exotic car.And then sitting with the ukes playing outside.George saying THIS IS CANDLE STICK PARK...sounded like he was saying this is our very final concert...arent us beatle fans incredible we never miss anything they say or do.I guess they still are under the microscope.

16 November 2013
2.29pm
DrBeatle
Boston
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1437
Member Since:
29 November 2012
Offline
23

bewareofchairs said

Atlas said
What came over to me was Paul walking on egg-shells round George, very aware he should not be seen as trying to dominate, or appear as 'dominating'……But be seen instead to be giving George the respect that he has always complained he never got within the Beatles.

At the same time Paul doesn't want to lose the credit he's due, or lose authority he always had musically over George and was the reality of the working relationship between them.

Complicated!

For me George comes across as being over defensive and ill at ease. It's as though he's anticipating situations that will illustrate to the world at large, (not least his Wilbury mates) how he suffered all those years as a 'sidekick'……. and is itching for an opportunity to stand up for himself.

Complicated...

You can see both of their points of view.

 

There was definite tension there, and I agree it was painful to watch sometimes, but I honestly think people read too much into it. When you only see the edited footage it's difficult to tell because it can makes things seem much worse than they actually were. The "fight" between Paul and George in Let It Be, for example, isn't nearly as bad when you hear the full tape.

Something you also have to keep in mind is how being in that situation, particularly in Abbey Road with George Martin, probably brought back a lot of unpleasant memories for George which he had spent years trying to forget. It's easier to be positive when you were at the top of the hierarchy. I know Paul tried, but even then (and now) he still continued to be patronising towards George. After everything he'd been through with his solo career and all the projects he collaborated on with other artists, I imagine it was difficult for him to be around Paul in that environment. No matter what, George was always just his little mate. That said, I do sympathise with Paul as well.

True, but there are also credible reports that George got into a big shouting match with Paul and Ringo in the studio, which is one of the reasons Now and Then was never completed.

 

"I know you, you know me; one thing I can tell you is you got to be free!"

 

Please Visit My Website, The Rock and Roll Chemist

Twitter: @blackbookblur

 

16 November 2013
2.31pm
DrBeatle
Boston
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1437
Member Since:
29 November 2012
Offline
24

robert said
George is extremely uncomfortable in these takes and I think there's a multitude of reasons - many of which have already been mentioned. But I will add one more reason/opinion. And I say this without necessarily being a major 'Paul fan' at all - nonetheless I offer the following:

Anthology is a story that has an ending - 4 guys who were united broke up in large part due to a business issue (as the immediate catalyst - lots of other issues as well for sure).

In the break up two were firmly united (John and George), one went with the other two (Ringo) and one stood his ground and opposed the other 3 (Paul).

The story ends and Paul was right. Klein was a thief. Apple was getting bilked.  The partnership was dissolved, they each go their own way, Paul's in-laws made him a boat load of money and Paul's solo career (in terms of financial success) dwarfs the other three. And the whole world knows it.

I think for George reviewing the Beatles history is a looking at story with a conclusion - and for him not a good one. It only magnifies Paul's position and diminishes George's. Also remember that from Pepper on pretty much every Beatles project (other than the White Album) was a Paul project.

So a trip down memory lane always ends up in the same place. George's melancholy temperment makes such memories always end bad. Because they Beatles break up was so bitter and so splintering the last year 69-70 dominate the story and so the end point is that Paul was right - about almost all of it - right down to Abbey Road album (heck he even re-did Let It Be).

And please note - I am not talking about music quality, musicianship, song writing, social causes, or anything but the business and the direction of the band.

History is written by the victors and in this case it was Paul. And so for George to have to come to the charitable hand of Paul McCartney is about as distasteful a thing he could do. Add to that no John to keep Paul in check and you get the awkward footage you get.

My 2 cents and over priced at that.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Great points!

 

"I know you, you know me; one thing I can tell you is you got to be free!"

 

Please Visit My Website, The Rock and Roll Chemist

Twitter: @blackbookblur

 

16 November 2013
8.27pm
breatle62
The Jacaranda
Forum Posts: 28
Member Since:
15 November 2013
Offline
25

Even when they talked to paul after george passed away...he still referred too him as his lil brother... the only thing is with all the success john/paul had.. wouldnt you think, they wouldve even during the late beatle yrs they wouldve encouraged him to do a solo or help him with a solo project...too boost his spirits, they werent touring so they had much more time..I know i personally wouldve went out of my way if i were them to help him and ringo...I believe Wonderwall was all george but not sure...

16 November 2013
8.46pm
meanmistermustard
Moderator



Forum Posts: 10402
Member Since:
1 May 2011
Offline
26

I don't think George wanted their help, he would rather have been a moderate success of his own than piggyback on the Beatles name which would have happened if John or Paul had gotten involved. If anything he wanted to lose the connection to his ex-band that was always attached whether he liked it or not.

Wonderwall was all George's idea & concept with no other Beatles involved.

Don’t make your love suffer insecurities, trade the baggage of self to set another one free. ('Paper Skin' - Kendall Payne)
16 November 2013
11.16pm
Linde
The Netherlands
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2173
Member Since:
21 November 2012
Offline
27

I don't know if he really wanted to do it or not, but he needed the money. Everything about that has been said in this thread already.

I don't think he really disliked Paul either during this. Maybe he was a bit frustrated, but they were on good terms, weren't they? He does look a bit uncomfortable, but that could also be because this was a ''Beatles thing''. I don't know if that was really clear..

16 November 2013
11.37pm
trcanberra
Canberra, ACT
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1770
Member Since:
29 August 2013
Offline
28

meanmistermustard said
I don't think George wanted their help, he would rather have been a moderate success of his own than piggyback on the Beatles name which would have happened if John or Paul had gotten involved. If anything he wanted to lose the connection to his ex-band that was always attached whether he liked it or not.

Wonderwall was all George's idea & concept with no other Beatles involved.

I suspect there is something in this.  There is a Lennon interview where he says George approached him to help him finish a song.  John said he had to bite his tongue trying not to tell him to bugger off because he only worked with Paul.  I suspect George picked up on the vibes so maybe didn't ask again.

 

17 November 2013
9.11pm
bewareofchairs
Royal Command Performance
Forum Posts: 119
Member Since:
18 December 2012
Offline

DrBeatle said

bewareofchairs said

Atlas said
What came over to me was Paul walking on egg-shells round George, very aware he should not be seen as trying to dominate, or appear as 'dominating'……But be seen instead to be giving George the respect that he has always complained he never got within the Beatles.

At the same time Paul doesn't want to lose the credit he's due, or lose authority he always had musically over George and was the reality of the working relationship between them.

Complicated!

For me George comes across as being over defensive and ill at ease. It's as though he's anticipating situations that will illustrate to the world at large, (not least his Wilbury mates) how he suffered all those years as a 'sidekick'……. and is itching for an opportunity to stand up for himself.

Complicated...

You can see both of their points of view.

 

There was definite tension there, and I agree it was painful to watch sometimes, but I honestly think people read too much into it. When you only see the edited footage it's difficult to tell because it can makes things seem much worse than they actually were. The "fight" between Paul and George in Let It Be, for example, isn't nearly as bad when you hear the full tape.

Something you also have to keep in mind is how being in that situation, particularly in Abbey Road with George Martin, probably brought back a lot of unpleasant memories for George which he had spent years trying to forget. It's easier to be positive when you were at the top of the hierarchy. I know Paul tried, but even then (and now) he still continued to be patronising towards George. After everything he'd been through with his solo career and all the projects he collaborated on with other artists, I imagine it was difficult for him to be around Paul in that environment. No matter what, George was always just his little mate. That said, I do sympathise with Paul as well.

True, but there are also credible reports that George got into a big shouting match with Paul and Ringo in the studio, which is one of the reasons Now and Then was never completed.

  

I'm not saying they didn't fight, just that in the grand scheme of things it probably wasn't as big of a deal as it's been made out to be - like a typical fight between siblings who know they love each other deep down and make up a couple hours later.

EDIT: This is an interesting quote posted on the wonderful amoralto tumblr: 

DAVIS: So the Anthology has built some bridges between Paul and George?
SMEATON: Paul is very protective of George. He knows now what went on, how George was hurt at the end of it, and how George went on to prove that he was a great musician and songwriter. I think Paul respects that a lot more. George says in the programme that when he wanted to bring in his songs, it was very difficult for him to present them when they already had Lennon-McCartney songs there. John and Paul had written all their early songs before they even had a record deal, whereas George was trying to write his first songs in the studio. It was a bit embarrassing for him when he knew they already had all these great songs. Even George Martin says that he didn’t give George Harrison a chance.

On one occasion, Paul and George sat in the editing suite with Ringo looking at the last programme. George was on the screen talking about the split, and Paul turned to George sitting next to him and said, “I didn’t know you felt like that. Is that really how you felt?” George said, “Of course it was.” And Paul said he didn’t know that. They’d never actually confronted each other about it.

— Bob Smeaton (Anthology series director), interview w/ Andy Davis for Record Collector: Inside the Beatle’s Anthology. (1995)

18 November 2013
5.01pm
DrBeatle
Boston
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1437
Member Since:
29 November 2012
Offline
30

trcanberra said

meanmistermustard said
I don't think George wanted their help, he would rather have been a moderate success of his own than piggyback on the Beatles name which would have happened if John or Paul had gotten involved. If anything he wanted to lose the connection to his ex-band that was always attached whether he liked it or not.

Wonderwall was all George's idea & concept with no other Beatles involved.

I suspect there is something in this.  There is a Lennon interview where he says George approached him to help him finish a song.  John said he had to bite his tongue trying not to tell him to bugger off because he only worked with Paul.  I suspect George picked up on the vibes so maybe didn't ask again.

 

That song was Taxman and yes, John admitted as much that he wanted to tell George to fuck off but he sucked it up and helped him anyway. John was also almost ALWAYS "coincidentally" absent from the studio when it was time to record George's songs, especially '67-'69, whereas Paul always helped out and did extra duty on instruments, vocals, and arguably turned in some of his best performances (see "Something," etc) yet to his dying day, George idolized John and would shit all over Paul. Complicated guy!

"I know you, you know me; one thing I can tell you is you got to be free!"

 

Please Visit My Website, The Rock and Roll Chemist

Twitter: @blackbookblur

 

18 November 2013
5.03pm
parlance
Slaggers
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 5504
Member Since:
8 November 2012
Offline
31

DrBeatle said
 yet to his dying day, George idolized John and would shit all over Paul. Complicated guy!

Why do you keep saying "to his dying day" when they clearly had made amends?

parlance

 

The following people thank parlance for this post:

C.R.A.

Beware of sadness. It can hit you. It can hurt you. Make you sore and what is more, that is not what you are here for. - George

Check out my fan video for Paul's song "Appreciate" at YouTube and Vimeo.

18 November 2013
6.59pm
DrBeatle
Boston
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1437
Member Since:
29 November 2012
Offline
32

parlance said

DrBeatle said
 yet to his dying day, George idolized John and would shit all over Paul. Complicated guy!

Why do you keep saying "to his dying day" when they clearly had made amends?

parlance

 

Maybe I'm exaggerating, but from the stuff I've read, George and Paul came to some sort of peace/reconciliation, but it's also been said George never truly forgave Paul even at the end. *shrug* None of us know for sure, of course, except for the two of them. But in my view, strictly as an outside observer, it seems like there was always just a little bit of that resentment toward Paul still lingering on in George even after they made amends (which, if I'm not mistaken, was around 1999/2000).

 

"I know you, you know me; one thing I can tell you is you got to be free!"

 

Please Visit My Website, The Rock and Roll Chemist

Twitter: @blackbookblur

 

18 November 2013
8.32pm
trcanberra
Canberra, ACT
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1770
Member Since:
29 August 2013
Offline
33

parlance said

DrBeatle said
 yet to his dying day, George idolized John and would shit all over Paul. Complicated guy!

Why do you keep saying "to his dying day" when they clearly had made amends?

parlance

 

I read somewhere that Paul felt he was still not on the best of terms with George when he died and was a bit sad about it.  Can't recall which book it was sorry.

 

18 November 2013
8.51pm
parlance
Slaggers
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 5504
Member Since:
8 November 2012
Offline

trcanberra said

parlance said

DrBeatle said
 yet to his dying day, George idolized John and would shit all over Paul. Complicated guy!

Why do you keep saying "to his dying day" when they clearly had made amends?

parlance

 

I read somewhere that Paul felt he was still not on the best of terms with George when he died and was a bit sad about it.  Can't recall which book it was sorry.

 

I'm skeptical of these claims since Paul said in that Larry King interview that the last time he and George talked, they held hands and had what sounded like an intimate conversation of dear friends. And there's the fact that George spent his last days in a house Paul was renting. I can't see George agreeing to that if they weren't getting along, especially as he had plenty of friends in Los Angeles who probably would have offered their homes.

I suspect people who claim George never forgave Paul just want to keep the drama going. Makes for a more interesting tale than reconciliation, I suppose, particularly if you don't care for Paul. Edit: After reading MMM's response, I figured I should add that's not directed at either DrBeatle or trcanberra.

parlance

Beware of sadness. It can hit you. It can hurt you. Make you sore and what is more, that is not what you are here for. - George

Check out my fan video for Paul's song "Appreciate" at YouTube and Vimeo.

18 November 2013
9.06pm
meanmistermustard
Moderator



Forum Posts: 10402
Member Since:
1 May 2011
Offline
35

As far as i know Paul and George had reconciled before George died; didn't Paul say the same thing about holding George's hand in Living In The Material World documentary. They really were like brothers who had disagreements and spent many years apart due to difficulties when growing up but all the shit between them disappeared when one needed help or something happened. Why books and people (and i don't mean trcanberra) have to write crap about that i find difficult to understand.

Don’t make your love suffer insecurities, trade the baggage of self to set another one free. ('Paper Skin' - Kendall Payne)
18 November 2013
9.31pm
mccartneyalarm
Carnegie Hall
Forum Posts: 243
Member Since:
9 July 2013
Offline
36

I am almost positive that George and Paul had reconciled. He was with George a few days before he died, and George was staying in a house Paul was renting. That would not have happened if there was bad blood between them. Paul is on good terms with Olivia and Dhani. I really don't think there was anything but love between them in the end. (I've seen this in several sources, but I can't remember them exactly to cite to them. Sorry).

"And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make."

18 November 2013
9.34pm
bewareofchairs
Royal Command Performance
Forum Posts: 119
Member Since:
18 December 2012
Offline
37

DrBeatle said

trcanberra said

meanmistermustard said
I don't think George wanted their help, he would rather have been a moderate success of his own than piggyback on the Beatles name which would have happened if John or Paul had gotten involved. If anything he wanted to lose the connection to his ex-band that was always attached whether he liked it or not.

Wonderwall was all George's idea & concept with no other Beatles involved.

I suspect there is something in this.  There is a Lennon interview where he says George approached him to help him finish a song.  John said he had to bite his tongue trying not to tell him to bugger off because he only worked with Paul.  I suspect George picked up on the vibes so maybe didn't ask again.

 

That song was Taxman and yes, John admitted as much that he wanted to tell George to fuck off but he sucked it up and helped him anyway. John was also almost ALWAYS "coincidentally" absent from the studio when it was time to record George's songs, especially '67-'69, whereas Paul always helped out and did extra duty on instruments, vocals, and arguably turned in some of his best performances (see "Something," etc) yet to his dying day, George idolized John and would shit all over Paul. Complicated guy!

That attitude of John's always annoyed me, tbh, because George was always happy to help him with his songs, and he benefited a great deal from it. George appreciated Paul's help and has said as much. In fact he was probably on better terms with Paul throughout the 70's than he was with John. I think his reluctance to publicly criticise John was more to do with John being likely to turn on him if he felt offended. You only need to look at how he reacted to George's book, and Yoko not being allowed to perform at the Concert for Bangladesh to see why George might've felt he had to walk on egg shells. Paul, on the other hand, was like family and the fact George felt comfortable enough to say whatever he wanted about him is I think in a way a testament to how strong he felt their relationship was.

18 November 2013
10.54pm
Atlas
Ed Sullivan Show
Forum Posts: 184
Member Since:
18 October 2013
Offline
38

There could be something in what 'Beware……' is saying. Paul seems to me to be very strong minded but at the same time always aware of consequences.

John on the other hand could bite and worry about the consequences another time.

19 November 2013
12.24am
trcanberra
Canberra, ACT
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1770
Member Since:
29 August 2013
Offline
39

meanmistermustard said
As far as i know Paul and George had reconciled before George died; didn't Paul say the same thing about holding George's hand in Living In The Material World documentary. They really were like brothers who had disagreements and spent many years apart due to difficulties when growing up but all the shit between them disappeared when one needed help or something happened. Why books and people (and i don't mean trcanberra) have to write crap about that i find difficult to understand.

Cheers - (and Parlance and mcalarm) - I hadn't heard about the reconciliation / house thing - nice to know.  I did watch the doco; I will have to listen more closely when I watch it again - I must have been dozing during that bit :)

 

19 November 2013
5.53pm
DrBeatle
Boston
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1437
Member Since:
29 November 2012
Offline
40

bewareofchairs said

DrBeatle said

trcanberra said

meanmistermustard said
I don't think George wanted their help, he would rather have been a moderate success of his own than piggyback on the Beatles name which would have happened if John or Paul had gotten involved. If anything he wanted to lose the connection to his ex-band that was always attached whether he liked it or not.

Wonderwall was all George's idea & concept with no other Beatles involved.

I suspect there is something in this.  There is a Lennon interview where he says George approached him to help him finish a song.  John said he had to bite his tongue trying not to tell him to bugger off because he only worked with Paul.  I suspect George picked up on the vibes so maybe didn't ask again.

 

That song was Taxman and yes, John admitted as much that he wanted to tell George to fuck off but he sucked it up and helped him anyway. John was also almost ALWAYS "coincidentally" absent from the studio when it was time to record George's songs, especially '67-'69, whereas Paul always helped out and did extra duty on instruments, vocals, and arguably turned in some of his best performances (see "Something," etc) yet to his dying day, George idolized John and would shit all over Paul. Complicated guy!

That attitude of John's always annoyed me, tbh, because George was always happy to help him with his songs, and he benefited a great deal from it. George appreciated Paul's help and has said as much. In fact he was probably on better terms with Paul throughout the 70's than he was with John. I think his reluctance to publicly criticise John was more to do with John being likely to turn on him if he felt offended. You only need to look at how he reacted to George's book, and Yoko not being allowed to perform at the Concert for Bangladesh to see why George might've felt he had to walk on egg shells. Paul, on the other hand, was like family and the fact George felt comfortable enough to say whatever he wanted about him is I think in a way a testament to how strong he felt their relationship was.

EXACTLY! It's been widely and factually shown over the years, too, that George was nasty to Yoko from day 1 and he never softened his stance on her, whereas Paul even got them back together in the mid-70s, to his own detriment (John had planned on writing and recording with him and Wings for the V&M album before Paul got him back with Yoko, who promptly put the kibosh on that!). Don't forget that Paul, in addition to letting George use his house for his dying days, also paid a large part of George's treatments in that last year. I know that George deep down did love Paul like a brother...hell, all FOUR of them felt that way about each other. It was just some of the lingering resentment that George had a hard time over the course of his post-Fabs life.

I'm currently reading and will subsequently review the new George bio, "Behind the Locked Door," and I'm interested to see what it has regarding this very complex relationship between Paul and George.

 

"I know you, you know me; one thing I can tell you is you got to be free!"

 

Please Visit My Website, The Rock and Roll Chemist

Twitter: @blackbookblur

 

Forum Timezone: Europe/London

Most Users Ever Online: 597

Currently Online: Mr Bellamy
50 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

meanmistermustard: 10402

mr. Sun king coming together: 6916

Ahhh Girl: 5535

parlance: 5504

Annadog40: 4751

mithveaen: 4651

Zig: 4555

Mr. Kite: 4306

Ron Nasty: 3218

fabfouremily: 2947

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 88

Members: 2685

Moderators: 4

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 34

Topics: 3146

Posts: 140574

Newest Members: phile24, ZoeLouk, arsentev78, Rocky You're a Blackbird, Johnlovedcats

Moderators: Ahhh Girl: 5535, meanmistermustard: 10402, Zig: 4555, Joe: 3497

Administrators: Joe: 3497, Ellie: 1

Members Birthdays
Today: None
Upcoming: None