Log In
Register
Home
Topic RSS
6.28pm
9 June 2010
Offline
Couldn't one also do "1*23*4567"? I've also seen Strawberry do "123*4*567".
7.12pm
14 April 2010
Offline
Call me nostalgic – it seemed more meaningful when the only cool sums were 9 or 17.
7.57pm
19 September 2010
Offline
Zig said:
Call me nostalgic – it seemed more meaningful when the only cool sums were 9 or 17.
I agree. But it is mean to
&
if we don't have 16 and 19. The *12*34567 is unneeded.
The fact that I just got a twelve but am not doing the YNGMYM thing is proof.
12.12am
4 December 2010
Offline
Wait… 19?
I've also seen *8* days a week.
I agree that 9 and 17 feel more significant
12.13am
19 September 2010
Offline
The Walrus said:
Wait… 19?
Taxman… "One for you 19 for me."
12.16am
4 December 2010
Offline
Good thinking batman.
*16* 
12.19am
19 September 2010
Offline
The Walrus said:
Good thinking batman.
*16*
I'd rather be the Eggman, if you don't mind.
2.56am
9 June 2010
Offline
Zig said:
Call me nostalgic – it seemed more meaningful when the only cool sums were 9 or 17.
Nostalgic. 
But I kind of feel the same way. Heck, I think it was more meaningful when A) the only meaningful one was 9 and B) you didn't announce every single time you get one. I still usually only announce a 9 when it seems appropriate. If I've done a one-sentence post, I think that seeing "*9*" at the bottom kind of ruins the "look" of the post, if that makes any sense at all.
It makes perfect sense.Most Users Ever Online: 597
Currently Online:
32 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
2 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
mr. Sun king coming together: 6530
MeanMrsMustard: 2773
meanmistermustard: 1498
GniknuS: 1362
PennyLane: 1223
Dear Prudence: 1181
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 86
Members: 1048
Moderators: 5
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 3
Forums: 14
Topics: 1662
Posts: 51710
Newest Members: Nick, Boyer Mitch, Catherine, AutomaticButt, Old Siam Sir
Moderators: Joe (2285), skye (2293), Ellie (1), Zig (2216), mithveaen (4465)
Administrators: Joe (2285)
