Let It Be in 2013 | Page 2 | Fab forum

A A A

Please consider registering
guest

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Search
Advanced Search
Advanced Search:

— Forum Scope —



— Match —



— Forum Options —




Wildcard usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Page: 12
Topic RSS
Let It Be in 2013
18 May 2012
10.10pm
RevolvingPiggies
a place where I can go
Paris Olympia
Forum Posts: 146
Member Since:
23 October 2011
Offline
21

Wow, excited for this! Do you think they'd show it in theaters?

I am very happy, and one reason is because I have The Beatles. Thank you!!!! <3 <3 <3 <3
18 May 2012
10.23pm
meanmistermustard
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 3427
Member Since:
1 May 2011
Offline
22

I doubt its going to be out in 2013 piggies. The title of the thread was based on a comment by Michael Lindsay-Hogg but the ultimate decision has to be complete agree from Paul, Yoko, Olivia and Ringo. Yoko would probably release anything if she could spin it to make Johns image remain intact and herself look great – tho that might be hard with the Let It Be film. As for the other 3 i dont think they want to go back there (Olivia keeping George's views).

Shame for the fans and hopefully im wrong.

"Well, probably we'll sell less records, less people'll go to see the film, we'll write less songs, and we'll all die of failure" (John Lennon 8/64)
19 May 2012
2.09pm
Ben Ramon
Candlestick Park
Forum Posts: 541
Member Since:
26 March 2012
Offline
23

I get the impression Paul doesn't want it to go ahead because he feels it makes him look bossy and pedantic rather than the everyman diplomat he likes to be in public.

SHUT UP - Paulie's talkin'
21 May 2012
4.19pm
Joe
Pepperland
Admin
Forum Posts: 2702
Member Since:
31 March 2008
Offline
24

Those last couple of points are very Neil Aspinall era, if that means anything. Since he left Apple and Jeff Jones took over as CEO they've been WAY more proactive in reissuing material. Aspinall basically said no to everything apart from Anthology, Live At The BBC and Yellow Submarine for 30 years. I suspect we'll see LIB next year – if for no other reason, they'll want it out before everyone stops buying optical discs and the market shrinks.

Please don't spoil my day; I'm miles away
21 May 2012
7.29pm
Long John Silver
Hollywood Bowl
Forum Posts: 368
Member Since:
9 May 2012
Offline
25

Since we are talking about reissues, are there any news on re-releasing all The Beatles albums on vinyl?

Living is easy with eyes closed, misunderstanding all you see.
21 May 2012
11.58pm
RingoStarr39
Baden, PA
The Cavern Club
Forum Posts: 76
Member Since:
22 April 2011
Offline
26

No new Beatles vinyl I can think of, but Paul's new remastered Ram album will be on vinyl in stereo and mono. And George's new Early Takes' albums are on vinyl too.

"We would be so happy, you and me. No one there to tell else what to do."
22 May 2012
2.48pm
Long John Silver
Hollywood Bowl
Forum Posts: 368
Member Since:
9 May 2012
Offline
27

Yeah I know about RAM, and I have to say Paul's vinyl are a bit expensive, at least on Amazon. I think I saw Band On the Run is 37 euros…

Living is easy with eyes closed, misunderstanding all you see.
Page: 12
All RSS
Forum Timezone: Europe/London

Most Users Ever Online: 597

Currently Online: mja6758, HeyTrud, aislejodi
11 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

mr. Sun king coming together: 6972

meanmistermustard: 3427

MeanMrsMustard: 2794

Egroeg Evoli: 1517

vonbontee: 1427

GniknuS: 1365

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 87

Members: 1683

Moderators: 5

Admins: 1

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 33

Topics: 2393

Posts: 73218

Newest Members: fartoons, RIGBY, WilliamCampbell, JQ, Juliana Melo

Moderators: Joe (2702), skye (2295), Ellie (1), Zig (2752), mithveaen (4675)

Administrators: Joe (2702)