The Beatles: All These Years by Mark Lewisohn | Page 15 | Beatles books | Fab forum

Please consider registering
Guest

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

  

— Match —

   

— Forum Options —

   

Wildcard usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

The Beatles: All These Years by Mark Lewisohn
8 September 2013
4.45pm
parlance
Slaggers
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 5109
Member Since:
8 November 2012
Offline
281

Maybe when the book comes out, there should be a thread specifically for spoilers, so people can read if they choose to.

parlance

Beware of sadness. It can hit you. It can hurt you. Make you sore and what is more, that is not what you are here for. - George

Check out my fan video for Paul's song "Appreciate" at YouTube and Vimeo.

8 September 2013
4.59pm
Linde
The Netherlands
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2046
Member Since:
21 November 2012
Offline
282

I'm superjealous. I have to wait months before I'll have enough money to order it. I still have to spend for at least 400 euros on schoolbooks this year and as I'm working less because of school, money is becoming more of a problem.

I don't think I'll get it for Sinterklaas either, as it's so expensive.

9 September 2013
10.45pm
trcanberra
Canberra, ACT
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1684
Member Since:
29 August 2013
Offline
283

"the first true and accurate account of the Beatles"

Really?

While the book looks impressive I find that claim hard to take.

10 September 2013
3.55pm
fabfouremily
Sitting in an English garden
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2934
Member Since:
3 May 2012
Offline
284

I suppose that's been said because pick up any book on the Beatles, and you'll find some fault. Some are just minor ones that you spot easily and just read past, but they're still there. In this book, according to them/Lewisohn, there won't even be any of those ones, though. That's how I interpreted that.

''We're just knocked out. We heard about the sell out. You gotta get an album out, you owe it to the people. We're so happy we can hardly count.''

10 September 2013
4.42pm
Joe
Pepperland
Admin
Forum Posts: 3452
Member Since:
31 March 2008
Offline
285

I don't think this has been mentioned before, but amazon.com has what's presumably the US artwork. It's way nicer than what we're getting here in the UK, is appropriately classy, and even – gasp! – features pictures of The Beatles:

Lest we forget, here's the UK version for comparison:

What was that old adage about judging books and covers?

Please don't spoil my day; I'm miles away

Can buy me love! Please consider using these links to support the Beatles Bible: Amazon | iTunes

10 September 2013
5.38pm
DrBeatle
Boston
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1413
Member Since:
29 November 2012
Offline
286

I noticed that last week but neglected to mention it…I've got the US edition on preorder, but my mum and dad are going to get me the UK edition for Christmas. I do have to say, the UK cover art is total shit…I'm sorry, but it is. Even if they aren't going to use the Beatles drop-T logo, they can do something better (as evidenced by this US artwork). And it's set seeing how Lewisohn tweeted pictures of himself holding the finished product from the printers with that art. It's an utter load of crap…thank goodness, as you say Joe, the inside will be better than the outside. It looks like something cheesy done on photoshop or Microsoft Powerpoint!

"I know you, you know me; one thing I can tell you is you got to be free!"

 

Please Visit My Website, The Rock and Roll Chemist

Twitter: @blackbookblur

 

10 September 2013
5.49pm
Ahhh Girl
sailing on a winedark open sea
Moderator


Forum Posts: 4964
Member Since:
20 August 2013
Offline
287

I'm thinking of the covers with the idea of displaying the book in our "New Books" area in the library. I think the US cover would draw more people to it.

But, in the long run, does the library need the more complete information offered in the UK version for scholarly study?

10 September 2013
5.54pm
DrBeatle
Boston
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1413
Member Since:
29 November 2012
Offline
288

I guess you've got to weigh how many people apart from hardcore fans will use the book for research purposes and/or care about the extra wealth of info, vs. the vast majority of the general public who will probably be fine with the abridged version.

"I know you, you know me; one thing I can tell you is you got to be free!"

 

Please Visit My Website, The Rock and Roll Chemist

Twitter: @blackbookblur

 

10 September 2013
6.08pm
meanmistermustard
Moderator



Forum Posts: 9776
Member Since:
1 May 2011
Offline
289

There is no doubt the US is far more appealing on the eye, would be nice to open the package when it arrives and go all gooey when seeing it. Ah well, as long as the inside is excellent i'll get thru.

Why is there no "volume 1" on the UK?

"Well, probably we'll sell less records, less people'll go to see the film, we'll write less songs, and we'll all die of failure" (John Lennon 8/64)
10 September 2013
6.29pm
DrBeatle
Boston
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1413
Member Since:
29 November 2012
Offline
290

Maybe he's going for the titles of each volume (Tune In, Turn On, Drop Out) instead of volume #s?

"I know you, you know me; one thing I can tell you is you got to be free!"

 

Please Visit My Website, The Rock and Roll Chemist

Twitter: @blackbookblur

 

10 September 2013
6.33pm
meanmistermustard
Moderator



Forum Posts: 9776
Member Since:
1 May 2011
Offline
291

So why is it on the US?

"Well, probably we'll sell less records, less people'll go to see the film, we'll write less songs, and we'll all die of failure" (John Lennon 8/64)
10 September 2013
6.40pm
DrBeatle
Boston
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1413
Member Since:
29 November 2012
Offline
292

My guess (and it's only a guess) is that since the UK mega-edition is considered the "real" edition, they don't care fuck all about the shortened US version and how it's titled :lol:

"I know you, you know me; one thing I can tell you is you got to be free!"

 

Please Visit My Website, The Rock and Roll Chemist

Twitter: @blackbookblur

 

10 September 2013
7.14pm
meanmistermustard
Moderator



Forum Posts: 9776
Member Since:
1 May 2011
Offline
293

So why spend time creating a better cover if they didn't gave a hairy monkey about it?

"Well, probably we'll sell less records, less people'll go to see the film, we'll write less songs, and we'll all die of failure" (John Lennon 8/64)
10 September 2013
7.46pm
DrBeatle
Boston
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1413
Member Since:
29 November 2012
Offline
294

meanmistermustard said
So why spend time creating a better cover if they didn't gave a hairy monkey about it?

Great point. No clue. He has different publishers in the UK and US…maybe the US just came up with a better cover?

 

"I know you, you know me; one thing I can tell you is you got to be free!"

 

Please Visit My Website, The Rock and Roll Chemist

Twitter: @blackbookblur

 

10 September 2013
8.54pm
Expert Textpert
In bed.
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1119
Member Since:
18 April 2013
Offline
295

 

Has it been confirmed that the two volumes inside the slip cover of the deluxe edition have the same artwork as the slip cover?

"This Beatles talk bores me to death." --John Lennon

10 September 2013
9.11pm
DrBeatle
Boston
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1413
Member Since:
29 November 2012
Offline
296

I believe so…Lewisohn was holding up copies with that same cover on his twitter. I can't see them having a 3rd cover variant anyway, that'd be a bit much (although I could be wrong!)

"I know you, you know me; one thing I can tell you is you got to be free!"

 

Please Visit My Website, The Rock and Roll Chemist

Twitter: @blackbookblur

 

10 September 2013
9.18pm
Expert Textpert
In bed.
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1119
Member Since:
18 April 2013
Offline
297

I personally don't find it ugly, but it does remind me of artwork you might find on a box for a game or computer software.

"This Beatles talk bores me to death." --John Lennon

10 September 2013
11.01pm
Linde
The Netherlands
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2046
Member Since:
21 November 2012
Offline
298

Why do those versions even have different covers? Why not use the same cover for both books? 

 

10 September 2013
11.18pm
Ahhh Girl
sailing on a winedark open sea
Moderator


Forum Posts: 4964
Member Since:
20 August 2013
Offline
299

Linde said
Why do those versions even have different covers? Why not use the same cover for both books? 

 

It is done to confuse the Beatlism historians trying to unravel the truth in the year 2262 as described by mja6758 in the "Philosophy question" thread. Which book contains the real truth? Some say the shorter one is the full account of the truth and the longer one throws in tidbits that only some thought to be true.

 

 

10 September 2013
11.30pm
DrBeatle
Boston
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1413
Member Since:
29 November 2012
Offline
300

Linde said
Why do those versions even have different covers? Why not use the same cover for both books? 

 

He has different publishers in the US and UK, that's most likely why.

 

"I know you, you know me; one thing I can tell you is you got to be free!"

 

Please Visit My Website, The Rock and Roll Chemist

Twitter: @blackbookblur

 

Forum Timezone: Europe/London

Most Users Ever Online: 597

Currently Online: johnnymain, AllMyLoving
40 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

meanmistermustard: 9776

mr. Sun king coming together: 6916

parlance: 5109

Ahhh Girl: 4964

mithveaen: 4651

Annadog40: 4163

Zig: 4100

Mr. Kite: 3696

Ron Nasty: 3034

fabfouremily: 2934

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 88

Members: 2595

Moderators: 4

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 34

Topics: 3159

Posts: 134149

Newest Members: Nereus, Mazza, AllMyLoving, KenO, mrneil2

Moderators: Ahhh Girl (4964), meanmistermustard (9776), Zig (4100), Joe (3452)

Administrators: Joe (3452), Ellie (1)

Members Birthdays
Today: None
Upcoming: None