The Beatles: All These Years by Mark Lewisohn. Tune In - What do you think? (Spoilers alert!) | Page 4 | Fab Forum

Introducing the inaugural Fab Forum February Fundraiser! Click here for more details.

Please consider registering
Guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
The Beatles: All These Years by Mark Lewisohn. Tune In - What do you think? (Spoilers alert!)
No permission to create posts
20 October 2013
10.51pm
Avatar
trcanberra
Canberra, ACT
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 5552
Member Since:
29 August 2013
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online

A VERY minor nitpick: Note 14 to Chapter 7 has a photo taken at Filey as the 'cover art' to a McCartney album from 1999.  Unless a version of the "Run Devil Run" album has a cover I haven't seen he is actually referring to the inlay picture sitting below the CD tray.  I have always taken the term 'cover art' as what is on the front or back of the album, not the inside.  I'm also not sure why he didn't just name the album.

Note, I'm not criticising anything here - just an observation :)

==> trcanberra and hongkonglady - Together even when not (engaged for those not in the know!) <==
20 October 2013
11.02pm
Avatar
Ron Nasty
"Where have you been?" "I'm not telling you..."
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 4956
Member Since:
17 December 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I agree on not naming the album being silly, but as to whether it's cover art, I think that depends on your point of view. I mean, I've always considered this part of the Sgt. Pepper cover art...

LpCoverSgtPeppersGatefold.jpgImage Enlarger

But not this...

http://i1.wp.com/www.feelnumb.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/sgt._pepper_lonely_hearts_club_band_the_beatles_insert_cut_outs.jpg?w=200Image Enlarger

...which is an insert.

 

"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty

23 October 2013
6.31am
Avatar
trcanberra
Canberra, ACT
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 5552
Member Since:
29 August 2013
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online

Lennonista said

trcanberra said
Most previous books either decided one version of events was the way things were (or made one up).  This one recounts everyone's differing recollection of key moments, and because of imperfect memory or occasionally a subconscious (or overt) attempt to change history some of them have 2 or three differing versions, leaving us with no idea of what really happened.  

Kind of like real life, innit?

Indeed - but the reason for buying and reading this biography is to find out what happened, not pay to read another lot of speculation.  Luckily this one has enough of an evidence base and a lot more more detail than I have read before, so I am happy enough to make allowances for the times where it is all guess-work (though there was that one page where two of the events had about 3 different versions and nothing decisive ....).

As mentioned - I am really enjoying the book - if there must be more than one version of events it is great to know what they all are.  I'm sure we are all deciding which ones we believe; I must say I tend to discount John's versions of some events as often he recounts events based on his mood at the time - though at others he is brutally honest and you can feel the 'truth' ringing.

 

==> trcanberra and hongkonglady - Together even when not (engaged for those not in the know!) <==
28 October 2013
2.12pm
Avatar
parlance
Slaggers
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 7092
Member Since:
8 November 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

From International Business Times: Paperback Writer: 15 Tidbits Of Trivia From First Volume Of Massive New Beatles Biography

Regarding this in particular:

*Historical accounts claim that Lennon and McCartney first met at a fete at St. Peter's Church in Woolton, Liverpool, in July 1957. But Lewisohn claims they actually met even earlier, outside a newsagent shop called Abba.

I caught the last question from Lewisohn's Q&A at his signing yesterday (will post about it in the non-spoilery thread), and he mentioned that Paul didn't want this information to get out. I haven't yet gotten to that part of the book, but apparently Paul only spoke privately to people about this "real" first meeting when he was a paperboy. If true, I find it interesting that Paul is so concerned with the mythology surrounding their first meeting that he'd guard that as a secret.

parlance

 

Beware of sadness. It can hit you. It can hurt you. Make you sore and what is more, that is not what you are here for. - George

Check out my fan video for Paul's song "Appreciate" at Vimeo or YouTube.

28 October 2013
9.04pm
Avatar
Ahhh Girl
sailing on a winedark open sea
Moderator


Forum Posts: 10770
Member Since:
20 August 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

trcanberra said
^ It's not stated quite so definitely in the book - it was a while back when I was reading that part but I think it was more of a 'there was a possibility they had met earlier on a bus or at the shops' kind of thing.  Just the kind of thing I was talking about with multiple possible versions.

I noticed in the Notes that Paul didn't like a number of things that Lewisohn claims - like everyone he seems to be pushing his own version of history.

Thus "Early Days". Like you mentioned in another thread, trying to sort out the truth and who did what bad thing takes a backseat to listening to the music you like.

@Linde - I thought of the Disney movie Aladdin in the scene where Aladdin tricks the genie into getting them out of the cave without using up one of his wishes. That little tactic of yours just might garner you an extra Christmas present. Excellent thinking.

 

28 October 2013
9.24pm
Avatar
trcanberra
Canberra, ACT
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 5552
Member Since:
29 August 2013
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online

^ Hmm - wonder if Early Days was partly a reaction to early drafts of the book?

==> trcanberra and hongkonglady - Together even when not (engaged for those not in the know!) <==
28 October 2013
9.48pm
Avatar
Ahhh Girl
sailing on a winedark open sea
Moderator


Forum Posts: 10770
Member Since:
20 August 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

trcanberra said
^ Hmm - wonder if
Early Days was partly a reaction to early drafts of the book?

I am caught up in the "figure of eight"  viscious cycle of whether to believe Paul's memories of those early days is crystal clear or if he wants people to believe his version/remembrance of what happened that long ago.

28 October 2013
10.31pm
Avatar
parlance
Slaggers
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 7092
Member Since:
8 November 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Ahhh Girl said

trcanberra said
^ Hmm - wonder if
Early Days was partly a reaction to early drafts of the book?

I am caught up in the "figure of eight"  viscious cycle of whether to believe Paul's memories of those early days is crystal clear or if he wants people to believe his version/remembrance of what happened that long ago.

Me too. I still need to catch up on the Howard Stern interview, but I wonder what exactly it is that Paul objected to with regards to the portrayal of his father disapproving of John.

parlance

Beware of sadness. It can hit you. It can hurt you. Make you sore and what is more, that is not what you are here for. - George

Check out my fan video for Paul's song "Appreciate" at Vimeo or YouTube.

29 October 2013
1.31am
Lennonista
Los Angeles
The Star-Club
Forum Posts: 71
Member Since:
23 April 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

parlance said

I caught the last question from Lewisohn's Q&A at his signing yesterday (will post about it in the non-spoilery thread), and he mentioned that Paul didn't want this information to get out. I haven't yet gotten to that part of the book, but apparently Paul only spoke privately to people about this "real" first meeting when he was a paperboy. If true, I find it interesting that Paul is so concerned with the mythology surrounding their first meeting that he'd guard that as a secret.

 

That was me (I) who asked that question! When he signed my book, ML told me he was glad I asked it. And then we chatted about Pete Shotton for a bit. What a cool, down-to-earth fella he was (ML, that is). Anyway, I asked that particular question because I also find it quite curious and was wondering if ML would give us any insight into the seemingly purposeful lack of clarity on Paul's part. He gave us a hint, I think, in his response. Very well played... telling, yet diplomatic.

And such is ML's style. I've only just begun the book (bought it yesterday and waiting for the Extended Version from the UK), but my guess is that those areas that are up for interpretation do sort of point you in the direction of a probable truth... but they're presented so diplomatically that you can't argue that ML has committed to a particular stance.

29 October 2013
1.51am
Lennonista
Los Angeles
The Star-Club
Forum Posts: 71
Member Since:
23 April 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
No permission to create posts
Forum Timezone: America/Chicago

Most Users Ever Online: 597

Currently Online: trcanberra, Annadog40, Merch, Silly Girl
45 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

meanmistermustard: 17171

Ahhh Girl: 10762

Annadog40: 9782

Zig: 7567

parlance: 7092

mr. Sun king coming together: 6980

Mr. Kite: 6092

Silly Girl: 5846

trcanberra: 5550

Ron Nasty: 4952

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 87

Members: 3336

Moderators: 4

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 42

Topics: 3820

Posts: 202478

Newest Members:

Mercury7, babapez, tom_pw, beatlezoe, nicklav99

Moderators: Ahhh Girl: 10762, meanmistermustard: 17171, Zig: 7567, Joe: 4392

Administrators: Joe: 4392, Ellie: 3

Members Birthdays
sp_BirthdayIcon
Today: DrBeatle
Upcoming: None