Philip Norman's books | Beatles books | Fab forum

A A A

Please consider registering
guest

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

  

— Match —

   

— Forum Options —

   

Wildcard usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic RSS
Philip Norman's books
15 July 2010
9.09am
Joe
Pepperland
Admin
Forum Posts: 3203
Member Since:
31 March 2008
Online

OK, I wanted to clarify what I wrote about Philip Norman elsewhere. Here are some things I really dislike about his books. Bear with me, this is a long one.

1. The introduction to my 2003 edition of Shout! was written post-Diana, post-9/11, and is frankly an embarrassment. Norman seems to have been writing it through a veil of tears as he tried to draw meaning from the deaths of Lennon, Harrison, Diana and the victims of the Twin Towers attack, but it doesn't wash.

Here's an extract:

"From the great discovery of Sixties youth through the example of the Beatles – that, with a bit of cheek, you could get away with anything – evolved the whole ghastly panoply of modern contempt for convention and self-restraint that encompasses urban terrorism at one extreme and supermarket 'trolley-rage' at the other. Just as John Lennon realised he could get away with cheeking his blue-blooded audience at the 1963 Royal Command performance, so the IRA realised they could get away with blowing up innocent women and children; [...] so egotism, viciousness and disregard for others grew to the point where Bin Laden and his fanatics found they could get away with the vileness of September 11 2001. If you seek to pinpoint the exact place in the twentieth century where civilisation ceased moving steadily forward and began taking quantum leaps backward, there can be no other culprit than the Sixties."

Now, the above was edited slightly as I was losing the will to live while typing, but the meaning wasn't changed. In between he also talks about the decay in society, with murderers, child molesters and celebrity stalkers, and tries to find their origins in the carefree liberation and ideologies of the 60s. This is bullshit, plain and simple, no?

2. From the same introduction:

"Weary though I may be of discussing the subject [of The Beatles], heart-sick as I am of the prospect of writing anything further about it (including this prologue)…"

Really, one way of engaging your readers would be to sound enthusiastic rather than like a jobbing writer.

3. Page 298, on the effect of the release of Sgt Pepper.

"The wildest acid freak, listening in his mental garret to Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds, could not doubt that his mind had been blown to undreamed realms of psychedelic fancy. Nervous old ladies, listening to When I'm Sixty-Four in their front parlours, would never be frightened of pop music again. Sergeant Pepper's cabaret show, with its twanging mystery and workaday humour, its uppercut drive and insinuating charm, invited the elderly as well as the young, the innocent no less than the pretentiously wise. On drama critic Kenneth Tynan, the most rigorous cultural commentator of his age, and on Mark Lewisohn, an eight-year-old in Kenton, Middlesex, the effect was the same. Tynan called Sgt Pepper a decisive moment in the history of Western civilisation. Mark Lewisohn stood in the garden as it played, shaking his head wildly while trying not to dislodge the cardboard moustache clenched under his nose."

It's obviously over-written, but I can see what he's trying to do. However, whereas Kenneth Tynan managed to sum up the significance of Pepper in just nine words, Norman needs more than a hundred. And that Mark Lewisohn section is so clumsy it's shocking. Lewisohn – who I have the utmost respect for – was a researcher on the first edition of Shout!, but still most casual Beatles fans have probably never heard of him. I imagine most readers of Shout! would have got to that part of the book and wondered, "WTF is Norman on about?"

3. On Linda McCartney's death:

"It was barely seven months since Diana,  Princess of Wales had been killed in a Paris car crash, unleashing a wave of hysterical mourning throughout Britain. An appetite still remained for a blonde-haired female martyr, and Linda McCartney perfectly fitted that bill. Forgetting their old hostility, the media extolled her campaigns for vegetarianism and animal rights in much the same terms as Diana's for AIDS and land-mine victims. For a brief, surreal moment, she became a kind of mini-'People's Princess', lauded with the same crazy disproportion as she had formerly been denigrated."

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you "crazy disproportion." Please, enough with the Diana stuff. Some of us weren't even slightly affected by her death. If people were touched by Linda's passing it was because they liked her, not any kind of ersatz proxy grief for a dead aristocrat killed by a drunk driver.

4. In his John Lennon biog, which I admit I've only dipped into, there's the same BS search for meaning. Consider this from the Plastic Ono Band era:

"[In Mother] a church bell tolled slowly and sonorously, a summons to mourning rather than festivity. Though John had copied it from an old Hammer horror film, no sound was more evocative of the years that Janov's therapy had forced him to relive. That slow, ominous chime might have been from St Peter's in Woolton, echoing through the silent winter Sunday evenings of his boyhood."

What are you talking about, you dismal writer? Oh, there's more:

"Its ending was a repeated scream of panic that might have come from John's six-year-old self that sunny day in Blackpool when Julia and the father then known as Alf had forced him to choose between them: 'Mama, don't go… Daddy come home!"

"It might have seemed impossible for him to twist the knife in himself anymore, but he did. The album's final, fragmentary track, My Mummy's Dead, transposed his 1958 heartbreak into a nursery rhyme, sung in the voice of a dazed child and strummed on a tinny guitar that might have been the very Gallotone Champion Julia had saved up to buy him. The broken words – "I can't explain… so much pain" – were like some psychic message; indeed, his handwriting in the original lyric has the jaggedly chaotic look of dictation from beyond the grave."

Might have been, might have been, might have been… but wasn't.

I think I'll leave it there. Now, clearly my edition of Shout! has been ruined by the updates and revisions he made after its original publication, but it's obvious to me that Philip Norman is no great writer. Please, can somebody tell my why he's sold so many books? Is it simply because there aren't that many full-scale biographies of The Beatles and Lennon out there, and he happened to fill a commercial space?

EDIT I think I should add that there is some good stuff in his books, despite the corny prose and phony conclusions. His work on the Quarry Men years is actually really good. It's just when he becomes a page-filler and engages in the search for meaning – which he does all too often – that I glaze over.

Please don't spoil my day; I'm miles away

Can buy me love! Please consider using these links to support the Beatles Bible: Amazon | iTunes

15 July 2010
1.50pm
Celebrated_Mr_K
Ed Sullivan Show
Forum Posts: 156
Member Since:
18 March 2010
Offline

I haven't read Shout, but I did read Norman's Lennon biography.  It, too, is overwritten and jumps to some ridiculous conclusions, while proclaiming to be ''balanced." 

I've heard others claim that the 60s were the beginning of the end, too.  It's nonsense.  When you look at the pre-60s, you see some truly horrible social norms…virulent, acceptable racism, lack of opportunity for women, persecution of homosexuals…good thing the 60s came along and reversed those trends.

Blaming a decade of social change in the West for bin Laden's terrorism boggles the mind.  bin Laden is the product of centuries of medieval, brutal religious doctrine, not "Sgt. Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band."

If Norman wants to blame todays ills on one decade, he really is either willfully ignorant or just stupid.  Pick an era–any era–and read about what life was like for the common folk.

15 July 2010
7.37pm
skye
AZ
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2295
Member Since:
13 November 2009
Offline

Good grief, you weren't kidding. And it's all like that? Blech.

What was he thinking with the Princess Diana thing? Are The Beatles not big enough any more?

Ad hoc, ad loc, and quid pro quo! So little time! So much to know!
15 July 2010
8.49pm
MeanMrsMustard
Nowhere Land
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2803
Member Since:
9 June 2010
Offline

OK, maybe I'm ignorant, but what was the IRA?

If I seem to act unkind, it's only me, it's not my mind that is confusing things.

15 July 2010
8.55pm
skye
AZ
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2295
Member Since:
13 November 2009
Offline
Ad hoc, ad loc, and quid pro quo! So little time! So much to know!
15 July 2010
9.05pm
MeanMrsMustard
Nowhere Land
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2803
Member Since:
9 June 2010
Offline

Ah. I'm in America and a minor, so I'm not to knowledgeable about these things. Skye, you're in Arizona, so you'll probably know what I thought of when I saw IRA. a-hard-days-night-george-10

If I seem to act unkind, it's only me, it's not my mind that is confusing things.

15 July 2010
9.07pm
mithveaen
Sitarday's room
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 4678
Member Since:
1 May 2010
Offline

Joe said:

OK, I wanted to clarify what I wrote about Philip Norman elsewhere. Here are some things I really dislike about his books. Bear with me, this is a long one.

1. The introduction to my 2003 edition of Shout! was written post-Diana, post-9/11, and is frankly an embarrassment.

Here's an extract:

"……. Just as John Lennon realised he could get away with cheeking his blue-blooded audience at the 1963 Royal Command performance, so the IRA realised they could get away with blowing up innocent women and children; [...] ."


 

Ok is this guy comparing John's comments with IRA's terrorist attacks? That's bullshit!

Here comes the sun….. Scoobie-doobie…… Something in the way she moves…..attracts me like a cauliflower… Bop. Bop, cat bop. Go, Johnny, Go. Beware of Darkness…  I believe in SH...
15 July 2010
9.13pm
MeanMrsMustard
Nowhere Land
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2803
Member Since:
9 June 2010
Offline

What does "rattle your (f***ing) jewelry" have to do with killing people?

If I seem to act unkind, it's only me, it's not my mind that is confusing things.

15 July 2010
9.17pm
Joe
Pepperland
Admin
Forum Posts: 3203
Member Since:
31 March 2008
Online

I missed a chunk out of the first quotation before. Here's the full passage:

From the great discovery of Sixties youth through the example of the Beatles – that, with a bit of cheek, you could get away with anything – evolved the whole ghastly panoply of modern contempt for convention and self-restraint that encompasses urban terrorism at one extreme and supermarket 'trolley-rage' at the other. Just as John Lennon realised he could get away with cheeking his blue-blooded audience at the 1963 Royal Command performance, so the IRA realised they could get away with blowing up innocent women and children; so successive governments realised they could get away with allowing the national infrastructure to fall into decay; so the police found they could get away with abandoning whole communities; so hospitals found they could get away with ceasing to accord patients basic human dignity; so the legions of murderers, child-molestors and muggers and celebrity stalkers found they could become ever more arrogantly audacious in their predating; so egotism, viciousness and disregard for others grew to the point where Bin Laden and his fanatics found they could get away with the vileness of September 11 2001. If you seek to pinpoint the exact place in the twentieth century where civilisation ceased moving steadily forward and began taking quantum leaps backward, there can be no other culprit than the Sixties.

I have to say it's not all as terrible as these quotations (which aren't really all that selective, more of a random sample), and he did interview a lot of key people, but for me the bad stuff really detracted from the good stuff. I'd be interested to hear from anyone who does like his books though.

Please don't spoil my day; I'm miles away

Can buy me love! Please consider using these links to support the Beatles Bible: Amazon | iTunes

15 July 2010
9.18pm
mithveaen
Sitarday's room
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 4678
Member Since:
1 May 2010
Offline

MeanMrs.Mustard said:

What does "rattle your (f***ing) jewelry" have to do with killing people?


 

That the machine guns say… "rat-rat-rat-rat-rat" ???

 

Sorry I couldn't resist.  a-hard-days-night-george-6

 

Edit Thanks for this info Joe. I can't stand a badly written book, so I guess I won't be buying those books quite soon….

Here comes the sun….. Scoobie-doobie…… Something in the way she moves…..attracts me like a cauliflower… Bop. Bop, cat bop. Go, Johnny, Go. Beware of Darkness…  I believe in SH...
15 July 2010
9.28pm
mithveaen
Sitarday's room
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 4678
Member Since:
1 May 2010
Offline
11

Ok the joke was lame, but the stuff this guy wrote made me feel cynical. Sorry if I make anyone angry.

Here comes the sun….. Scoobie-doobie…… Something in the way she moves…..attracts me like a cauliflower… Bop. Bop, cat bop. Go, Johnny, Go. Beware of Darkness…  I believe in SH...
16 July 2010
2.05am
skye
AZ
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2295
Member Since:
13 November 2009
Offline
12

MeanMrs.Mustard said:

Ah. I'm in America and a minor, so I'm not to knowledgeable about these things. Skye, you're in Arizona, so you'll probably know what I thought of when I saw IRA. a-hard-days-night-george-10


 

a-hard-days-night-ringo-7 Huh? I'm not sure how retirement accounts relate to Arizona. Do you mean NRA?

Ad hoc, ad loc, and quid pro quo! So little time! So much to know!
16 July 2010
2.20am
MeanMrsMustard
Nowhere Land
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2803
Member Since:
9 June 2010
Offline
13

Nah, I just meant that Arizona is in America.

NRA? Isn't that Utah? 

If I seem to act unkind, it's only me, it's not my mind that is confusing things.

16 July 2010
3.06am
skye
AZ
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2295
Member Since:
13 November 2009
Offline
14

Well neither can be linked to The Beatles. (Or can they?)

Ad hoc, ad loc, and quid pro quo! So little time! So much to know!
16 July 2010
3.34am
Marcelo
Shea Stadium
Forum Posts: 491
Member Since:
27 February 2010
Offline
15

I honestly can't say if Norman is a good or bad writer, but John's bio is captivating, interesting and I really like it.

Although, those parts about Linda and IRA are really absurd.

I'd like to say "thank you" on behalf of the group and ourselves and I hope we passed the audition. John Lennon
16 July 2010
5.01am
A Fiendish Thingy
By the banks of her own lagoon
Hollywood Bowl
Forum Posts: 379
Member Since:
27 March 2010
Offline
16

skye said:

Well neither can be linked to The Beatles. (Or can they?)


 

Bang bang, shoot shoot… a-hard-days-night-paul-7

I'm in love, but I'm lazy.
16 July 2010
8.43pm
MeanMrsMustard
Nowhere Land
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2803
Member Since:
9 June 2010
Offline
17

"Happiness Is A Warm Gun"… as presented by the Utah Legislature!

If I seem to act unkind, it's only me, it's not my mind that is confusing things.

14 October 2010
10.10pm
MeanMrsMustard
Nowhere Land
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2803
Member Since:
9 June 2010
Offline
18

QUESTION: I've started reading an edition of Shout! -- I'm not sure which one. Is it any good? I'm at the part where they're trying to get a record label, and everyone keeps turning them down. They don't have Ringo on board yet.

If I seem to act unkind, it's only me, it's not my mind that is confusing things.

15 October 2010
1.06pm
Joe
Pepperland
Admin
Forum Posts: 3203
Member Since:
31 March 2008
Online
19

I guess if you think it's good, it's good. I don't, for the reasons mentioned above.

Please don't spoil my day; I'm miles away

Can buy me love! Please consider using these links to support the Beatles Bible: Amazon | iTunes

28 October 2010
1.18am
Nicholaevna Romanov
The Jacaranda
Forum Posts: 26
Member Since:
27 October 2010
Offline
20

I'm reading the John Lennon bio now, Im finding it hard to get into and I much prefer Goldman's (yes I know its more a work of fiction). Philip Norman so far seems to be talking about almost everything else except John Lennon. Hopefully it will get better.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0

Most Users Ever Online: 597

Currently Online: Joe, Von Bontee, Zig, DrBeatle, Annadog40, Billy Rhythm, Kattatude
51 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Members Birthdays
Today None
Upcoming Ahhh Girl

Top Posters:

meanmistermustard: 7161

mr. Sun king coming together: 6972

mithveaen: 4678

parlance: 3628

MeanMrsMustard: 2803

Ron Nasty: 2517

skye: 2295

IveJustSeenAFaceo: 1899

LongHairedLady: 1891

Von Bontee: 1808

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 87

Members: 2329

Moderators: 6

Admins: 1

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 33

Topics: 3059

Posts: 109694

Newest Members: Simple Press, Kattatude, El Dorado, imtheTaxman, Ani

Moderators: Ahhh Girl (3308), fabfouremily (2941), Zig (3294), Joe (3202), Ellie (1), Simple Press (0)

Administrators: Joe (3202)