Lady Gaga! | Page 2 | All together now | Fab forum

A A A

Please consider registering
guest

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

  

— Match —

   

— Forum Options —

   

Wildcard usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic RSS
Lady Gaga!
26 January 2012
2.50pm
meanmistermustard
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 7237
Member Since:
1 May 2011
Offline
21

Your post came out well Mrs. McCarrison.

Personally i think Justin will slowly disappear as his audience grows up. He certainly cant act if his appearances in CSI are anything to go by.

"Well, probably we'll sell less records, less people'll go to see the film, we'll write less songs, and we'll all die of failure" (John Lennon 8/64)
26 January 2012
4.28pm
JET!
Rockin' in two by two
Candlestick Park
Forum Posts: 509
Member Since:
14 November 2010
Offline
22

I agree with both of those statements: that was a good post and Justil will eventually disappear.

I guess I feel like the Beatles sort of "invented" their own "look", but so many of the people who are famous nowadays are just fitting into a template of a "look", and they are still appreciated. I admire artists who do their own thing. I tire of seeing the same thing over and over again: a rapper, another rapper, ANOTHER rapper, someone who makes a generic dance beat, someone who makes ANOTHER dance beat…..and so on.

The sunshine bores the daylights outta me
27 January 2012
4.17am
Mrs.McCarrison
On the Internet
The Top Ten Club
Forum Posts: 57
Member Since:
28 October 2011
Offline
23

I also aggree with that. He probably will fade out, but you never know. I'm not saying I want Justin bieber to be te next Beatles, it's just an interesting thing to think about. And JET! I completely get what your saying. Artists are just beter when they do their own thing, and not try and fit into the mold that society has made for them.

I liked The Beatles before it was cool. (as in, I like all their music before 1965. I mean, I still like their later stuff but am very picky about what songs I like, while their older stuff I love it all. I am just not a fan of drugged out Beatles. Drugs scare me.) [  ] Single [  ] Taken [X] Mentally dating Paul McCartney George fell off the bandwagon! (inside joke)
27 January 2012
11.41am
meanmistermustard
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 7237
Member Since:
1 May 2011
Offline

There have been hundreds of acts labelled as 'the next beatles' and none have have anywhere close to being able to see the beatles dim headlights in the way-off distance. Its more a way of hyping the artist/band that being a statement of fact.

The same goes whether its the 'new' Michael Jackson, Aretha Franklin, Frank Sinatra, Madonna, Freddie Mercury, Spice Girls etc, which have all been designated to up and coming acts, most you never hear of again.

"Well, probably we'll sell less records, less people'll go to see the film, we'll write less songs, and we'll all die of failure" (John Lennon 8/64)
27 January 2012
12.34pm
mr. Sun king coming together
Nowhere Land
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 6972
Member Since:
19 September 2010
Offline
25

Bieber will fade, although when I was forced to listen to a snippet of his Christmas album (was watching football and a clip was played on the station), they aren't that bad. Nothing I'd ever buy, god no, but not bad. But, I think who says "Band X are the Next Beatles" matters. Because, a TMZ reporter saying it? Couldn't Care Less. Tom Powers on CBC Radio Two Drive a couple of months back? I'm more inclined to entertain the theory because of who says it. And the fact he said Arcade Fire was (well, said they could be Canada's Beatles) made me agree. It depends of the source.

I tried to think of something powerful and moving… and failed.  "You were given a choice between war and dishonor - you chose dishonor, and you shall have war" - Winston Churchill
7 March 2012
11.45am
arella
A Beginning
Forum Posts: 5
Member Since:
7 March 2012
Offline
26

I agree that it's unfair that people think so bad about Lady Gaga…. I think she is a great musician. She shows at every live performance that she has a great voice and that she is a real artist. I was at a concert once and I didn't regret it. I think people should give her a chance. Just because she likes to wear eccentric outfits to catch attention, it doesn't mean that she couldn't be a great artist. It just shows that the society judges her without listening to the actual music.

8 March 2012
12.30am
MeanMrsMustard
Nowhere Land
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2803
Member Since:
9 June 2010
Offline
27

Meh, I haven't heard enough of her music to judge. She's not that bad, although we do pick on her a little in my family:

[Polythene Dan and JoJo playing "Harry Potter"]

JoJo: Stupid-fy!

Polythene Dan [robotic voice]: 1 + 2 = 7. The sky is yellow. Lady Gaga's outfits are both modest and tasteful. 

As you can see, it's just the outfits. We don't really rip on anything else.

(Side note: I'd say that out of the "popular" artists, Adele's my favorite.) 

If I seem to act unkind, it's only me, it's not my mind that is confusing things.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0

Most Users Ever Online: 597

Currently Online: Matt Busby, Beatleva
48 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Members Birthdays
Today None
Upcoming Joe, Bungalow Bob

Top Posters:

meanmistermustard: 7237

mr. Sun king coming together: 6972

mithveaen: 4678

parlance: 3712

MeanMrsMustard: 2803

Ron Nasty: 2548

skye: 2295

IveJustSeenAFaceo: 2056

LongHairedLady: 1891

Von Bontee: 1855

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 87

Members: 2337

Moderators: 5

Admins: 1

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 33

Topics: 3067

Posts: 110814

Newest Members: BeatleZak, Mast Paster, Stephen Merrick, happyfeetgroove, captaindiggity

Moderators: Ahhh Girl (3415), fabfouremily (2941), Zig (3315), Joe (3220), Ellie (1)

Administrators: Joe (3220)