Topic RSS
3.24am

19 September 2010
OfflineDisney Stop Hacking The Beatles Bible and saying the Jonas Brothers are better than the Beatles. Just STOP IN THE NAME OF RINGO STARR
12.22pm
4 September 2010
OfflineIf he had said television is more popular than the Beatles, he might have got
away with it, but he just happened to be talking to a friend and he used
the words "Jonas Brothers" as a remote thing, not as what he thought – as Jonas Brothers,
as those other Jonas Brothers like other people see them. He just said "they" are
having more influence on kids and things than anything else, including the Beatles. But he said it in that way which is the wrong way. He was originally pointing out that fact in reference to the USA.
That the Jonas Brothers meant more to kids than the Beatles did. He
wasn't knocking it or putting it down. He was just saying it as a fact
and it's true more for USA than here. He isn't saying that we're
better or greater, or comparing the Jonas Brothers with the Beatles as a person or a band
as a thing or whatever it is. He just said what he said and it was wrong.
Or it was taken wrong.
And now it's all this. 
2.06pm
14 April 2010
Offline2.40pm
14 April 2010
Offline3.26pm
1 December 2009
OfflineAnswer to the thread question = Maybe they are, or maybe their manager and record label are trying to make them so; and who really cares? There's always been Nu-Beatleses, and there always will be – a new one every five years or so, as long as every half-decade produces a new crop of 8-to-18 year old girls. And when you reach my age and develop a similarly high blood pressure, maybe you find that it's not worth getting outraged over 'em; and that they may even have a catchy tune or two. (Still haven't knowingly heard the Jonases myself, other than a few seconds of guitar-strumming in some TV commercial I saw one time last summer.) Either way, they'll be gone soon enough.
12.38am
18 October 2010
OfflineJonas Brothers are a bunch of fags.
As you may have noticed anything I hate I will just insult for a few posts.
Well, I hate the Jonas Brothers. Not as much as Heather Mills, but then again, nothing's worse than Heather Mills.
They couldn't be the next Beatles even if they tried.
1. Because their songs are just so………hmm…..I'll leave it here incase I get banned for swearing again.
2. Because there are 3 of them. 3 cannot go into 4 any number of times.
3. The Beatles are a rock band (hence, The Beatles: Rock Band), the Jonas Brothers are pop. Therefore they cannot be the next Beatles.
2.23am
4 April 2010
OfflineJohnandonandonandon said:
Jonas Brothers are a bunch of fags.
As you may have noticed anything I hate I will just insult for a few posts.
Well, I hate the Jonas Brothers. Not as much as Heather Mills, but then again, nothing's worse than Heather Mills.
They couldn't be the next Beatles even if they tried.
1. Because their songs are just so………hmm…..I'll leave it here incase I get banned for swearing again.
2. Because there are 3 of them. 3 cannot go into 4 any number of times.
3. The Beatles are a rock band (hence, The Beatles: Rock Band), the Jonas Brothers are pop. Therefore they cannot be the next Beatles.
![]()
I love you.
5.03am
1 May 2010
Offline7.07am
18 October 2010
OfflineMrBig said:
Johnandonandonandon said:
Jonas Brothers are a bunch of fags.
As you may have noticed anything I hate I will just insult for a few posts.
Well, I hate the Jonas Brothers. Not as much as Heather Mills, but then again, nothing's worse than Heather Mills.
They couldn't be the next Beatles even if they tried.
1. Because their songs are just so………hmm…..I'll leave it here incase I get banned for swearing again.
2. Because there are 3 of them. 3 cannot go into 4 any number of times.
3. The Beatles are a rock band (hence, The Beatles: Rock Band), the Jonas Brothers are pop. Therefore they cannot be the next Beatles.
![]()
I love you.
I don't swing that way dude…o_O
Bahahahaha. Just kidding. But seriously, I don't.
1.06pm
4 September 2010
Offline1.49pm
14 December 2009
Offline8.11pm

19 September 2010
Offline5.03am
1 May 2010
Offline10.44am
4 September 2010
Offline12.26pm

19 September 2010
Offline2.27pm
14 April 2010
OfflineThey were any type of band they wanted to be. They were also any type of band they needed to be – just ask anyone who saw them play regularly in Hamburg.
I can't think of any other band that was so successfully adaptable. I don't believe there will ever be another Beatles.
To the fountain of perpetual mirth, Let it roll for all its worth.
2295 6972
7.34pm
1 May 2010
Offline8.52pm

27 February 2010
OfflineThere was a time (the 60's) when Pop was not a style, but a general category that included different music styles, such as Rock, Blues, Soul, Funk, etc.
I think that in the 80's this concept changed, naming Pop to a style of music. Then, in my humble opinion, The Beatles were both a Pop and Rock band.
Most Users Ever Online: 597
Currently Online:
2 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
mr. Sun king coming together: 6972
meanmistermustard: 3438
MeanMrsMustard: 2794
Egroeg Evoli: 1540
vonbontee: 1427
Von Bontee: 1378
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 87
Members: 1685
Moderators: 5
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 3
Forums: 33
Topics: 2400
Posts: 73471
Newest Members: BrettB, Ralphrennick, fartoons, RIGBY, WilliamCampbell
Moderators: Joe (2702), skye (2295), Ellie (1), Zig (2752), mithveaen (4675)
Administrators: Joe (2702)
Log In
Register
Home








