Topic RSS
8.12pm
7 August 2010
Offline6.49pm
7 August 2010
Offline7.08pm
1 May 2010
Offline7.18pm
7 August 2010
Offline7.28pm
1 May 2010
OfflineDear Prudence said:
GniknuS said:
Was it 1962 or 1964? I saw 1964 a few years ago and they were pretty spectacular. Their mannerisms and stage presence were both perfect!
1964, the 2 was a typo,and it was good wasent it?
Yeah, if the Beatles would have grown into 4 middle aged, slightly overweight moptops, they would have looked exactly like 1964. I remember I watched "Ringo" pretty much the entire show, and he looked and played like Ringo, especially when he would kind of tilt his head to the side and just bash away.
7.32pm
7 August 2010
OfflineGniknuS said:
Dear Prudence said:
GniknuS said:
Was it 1962 or 1964? I saw 1964 a few years ago and they were pretty spectacular. Their mannerisms and stage presence were both perfect!
1964, the 2 was a typo,and it was good wasent it?
Yeah, if the Beatles would have grown into 4 middle aged, slightly overweight moptops, they would have looked exactly like 1964. I remember I watched "Ringo" pretty much the entire show, and he looked and played like Ringo, especially when he would kind of tilt his head to the side and just bash away.
I know! My eyes couldent leave him, He was playing his part really well.
Most Users Ever Online: 597
Currently Online: sinco, LongHairedLady, YesterdayTomorrowForever
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
mr. Sun king coming together: 6972
meanmistermustard: 3420
MeanMrsMustard: 2794
Egroeg Evoli: 1514
vonbontee: 1427
GniknuS: 1365
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 86
Members: 1679
Moderators: 5
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 3
Forums: 33
Topics: 2389
Posts: 73074
Newest Members: Juliana Melo, musicfreak21, Victor Sepúlveda, TheNoWhereMan5870, darinh
Moderators: Joe (2698), skye (2295), Ellie (1), Zig (2752), mithveaen (4675)
Administrators: Joe (2698)
Log In
Register
Home


