<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>The Beatles Bible - Topic: What is the first true stereo album?</title>
	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/what-is-the-first-true-stereo-album/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[The Beatles&#039; songs, albums, photos, places and much more, including a day-by-day guide to their career from 1957 to 1970 and beyond, plus profiles of John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison, Ringo Starr and many others.]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Version 5.2.6</generator>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/what-is-the-first-true-stereo-album/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <item>
        	<title>DrBeatle on What is the first true stereo album?</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/what-is-the-first-true-stereo-album/#p66662</link>
        	<category>The albums</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/what-is-the-first-true-stereo-album/#p66662</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong>Gerell said </strong><br />
The early stereo mixes in my opinion were badly panned. The White Album sounds bearable in Stereo . Although Abbey Road and Let it Be can be considered as the same calibre as today's stereo mixes nowadays (in terms of mixing and not music)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This is my opinion as well. Not only do I prefer the mono mixes of all of the albums, but I prefer Sgt. Pepper and the White Album in mono.</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Gerell on What is the first true stereo album?</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/what-is-the-first-true-stereo-album/#p65749</link>
        	<category>The albums</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/what-is-the-first-true-stereo-album/#p65749</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>The early stereo mixes in my opinion were badly panned. The White Album sounds bearable in Stereo . Although Abbey Road and Let it Be can be considered as the same calibre as today's stereo mixes nowadays (in terms of mixing and not music)</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 01:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>mja6758 on What is the first true stereo album?</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/what-is-the-first-true-stereo-album/#p65729</link>
        	<category>The albums</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/what-is-the-first-true-stereo-album/#p65729</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong>vonbontee said </strong><br />
I've always been of the opinion that, regardless what they say, SPLHCB was the first sign that they were looking ahead to the possibilities offered by stereophonic sound - specifically, the full-spectrum panning of the "infamous" section of "A Day In The Life" and of the animals in"Good Morning Good Morning".</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I love the stereo <em>Pepper</em>. Prefer it to the mono. The trouble with claiming it as the first album where their attention was on the stereo mix, rather than the mono, is that they were not there for the stereo mix sessions. Paul left the country the day ...]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 20:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Egroeg Evoli on What is the first true stereo album?</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/what-is-the-first-true-stereo-album/#p65714</link>
        	<category>The albums</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/what-is-the-first-true-stereo-album/#p65714</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="spSmiley" src="http://www.beatlesbible.com/wp/wp-content/forum-smileys/ahdn_ringo_08.gif" width="35" alt="a-hard-days-night-ringo-8" /> Oh, that's a good point, too.</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 19:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>vonbontee on What is the first true stereo album?</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/what-is-the-first-true-stereo-album/#p65704</link>
        	<category>The albums</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/what-is-the-first-true-stereo-album/#p65704</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I've always been of the opinion that, regardless what they say, SPLHCB was the first sign that they were looking ahead to the possibilities offered by stereophonic sound - specifically, the full-spectrum panning of the "infamous" section of "A Day In The Life" and of the animals in"Good Morning Good Morning".</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 17:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>mja6758 on What is the first true stereo album?</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/what-is-the-first-true-stereo-album/#p65683</link>
        	<category>The albums</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/what-is-the-first-true-stereo-album/#p65683</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>The difference between the mono (earlier mix) and stereo (later mix) of Helter Skelter would be an obvious difference between the two. Mono about a minute shorter and no blisters on fingers!</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 03:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Egroeg Evoli on What is the first true stereo album?</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/what-is-the-first-true-stereo-album/#p65682</link>
        	<category>The albums</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/what-is-the-first-true-stereo-album/#p65682</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you, but right now, the only thing that comes to mind is Revolution 9, with the noise switching from left to right etc. And if I'm way off, I'm sorry, I'm not good with techinical recording stuff.</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 03:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>mja6758 on What is the first true stereo album?</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/what-is-the-first-true-stereo-album/#p65680</link>
        	<category>The albums</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/what-is-the-first-true-stereo-album/#p65680</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I noticed in the "Ranking Past Masters" a discussion emerging about Beatles mono and Beatles stereo. We all know there are differences. I do not understand those who say they only went stereo in 1969 though. If I had to name the first true stereo Beatles, as they intended it to be heard, it would have to be The White Album. Much as I love the mono, it was largely rough mono mixes made as they went along. The twenty-four hour session at the end of the recordings was used on perfecting the stereo mix. When you go through the ...]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 02:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
</channel>
</rss>