The US Albums | Page 14 | Fab Forum

Introducing the inaugural Fab Forum February Fundraiser! Click here for more details.

Please consider registering
Guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
The US Albums
No permission to create posts
5 March 2014
8.02am
Avatar
Oyster Black Pearl
Liverpool, UK
Royal Command Performance
Forum Posts: 125
Member Since:
20 September 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
261sp_Permalink

Expert Textpert said
I don't know what the proper definition of "folk rock" is, but
Nowhere Man and If You Needed Someone sound more psychedelic to me.  They don't sound to me like they belong with the other songs at all. 

Really? When I think of Folk/Rock circa 1965, I think of The Byrds. Those 2 songs ("Nowhere Man"/"If I Needed Someone") sound to me the closest to that sound than say "Think For Yourself" and "Wait" - both included on the US "Rubber Soul". 

 

5 March 2014
8.09am
Avatar
Oyster Black Pearl
Liverpool, UK
Royal Command Performance
Forum Posts: 125
Member Since:
20 September 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
262sp_Permalink

wetsroosa said 

However, in the US, Rubber Soul came across as a folk rock statement, and is considered a folk rock record, intended or not.

^^^^^^^

Agreed! :-)

One things for sure, I'm going to create a playlist of the ultimate Beatles Folk/Rock tracks. It'll contain about 7 songs. ;-)

 

 

5 March 2014
1.40pm
Avatar
Expert Textpert
In bed.
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2416
Member Since:
18 April 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
263sp_Permalink

Oyster Black Pearl said

Expert Textpert said
I don't know what the proper definition of "folk rock" is, but
Nowhere Man and If You Needed Someone sound more psychedelic to me.  They don't sound to me like they belong with the other songs at all. 

Really? When I think of Folk/Rock circa 1965, I think of The Byrds. Those 2 songs ("Nowhere Man"/"If I Needed Someone") sound to me the closest to that sound than say "Think For Yourself" and "Wait" - both included on the US "Rubber Soul". 

 

I think of The Byrds as psychedelic.

"This Beatles talk bores me to death." --John Lennon
5 March 2014
5.32pm
Avatar
Expert Textpert
In bed.
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2416
Member Since:
18 April 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
265sp_Permalink

mja6758 said
While The Byrds went onto psychedelia and other forms, The Byrds of 1965 (Mr Tambourine ManThe Bells of RhymneyAll I Really Want to DoTurn! Turn! Turn!) were the originators of folk rock. The term itself was invented by the US press in around June 1965 - around the time Mr Tambourine Man became their first US #1, and their debut album of the same name was released - to describe their fusion of traditional folk music and Dylan folk songs with an electric backing heavily influenced by The Beatles and other British invasion groups.

Well then since Nowhere Man and If You Needed Someone sound most like The Byrds and unlike any other song on the US album, I agree that we shouldn't call it folk rock. Maybe "acoustic rock" or "folk influenced." Whatever it is, it sounds better. And now I know why I don't like Nowhere Man--it sounds like The Byrds. Not that I hate The Byrds, I just like The Beatles sound better.

"This Beatles talk bores me to death." --John Lennon
8 March 2014
7.30pm
Avatar
SatanHimself
Hades-on-Leith
Candlestick Park
Forum Posts: 696
Member Since:
15 August 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
269sp_Permalink

I'll probably end up buying this box, but if I don't I do expect to pick up at least a copy of 'Hey Jude', which I consider a wonderful collection of singles and a great spiritual companion piece to 'Magical Mystery Tour'.  

E is for 'Ergent'.
9 March 2014
1.39am
Avatar
Into the Sky with Diamonds
New York
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1537
Member Since:
9 August 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
270sp_Permalink

"Meet the Beatles" is a phenomenal album - but when people think of that album, they're really thinking of Side 1:

I Want To Hold Your Hand, I Saw Her Standing There, This Boy, It Won't Be Long, All I've Got To Do, All My Loving.

But Side 2 is so weak in comparison!

Don't Bother Me, Little Child, Till There Was YouHold Me Tight, I Wanna Be Your Man, Not A Second Time...

What was Capitol thinking?

My guess is that they didn't have the rights to some of their other early songs + were already thinking ahead to the next album.

"Into the Sky with Diamonds" (the Beatles and the Race to the Moon – a history)
9 March 2014
11.56am
Avatar
meanmistermustard
Moderator



Forum Posts: 17188
Member Since:
1 May 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
271sp_Permalink

Capitol didn't own the US rights to the Please Please Me tracks, and the singles pre-I Want To Hold Your Hand, until winning a lawsuit in '64 and then released it as 'The Early Beatles' - having passed over the songs despite having first option on them. 

Which raises the question of how they got I Saw Her Standing There. Anyone know? 

Don’t make your love suffer insecurities, trade the baggage of self to set another one free. ('Paper Skin' - Kendall Payne)
10 March 2014
9.13am
Avatar
R4949
A Beginning
Forum Posts: 3
Member Since:
4 March 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

meanmistermustard said
Capitol didn't own the US rights to the
Please Please Me tracks, and the singles pre-I Want To Hold Your Hand, until winning a lawsuit in '64 and then released it as 'The Early Beatles' - having passed over the songs despite having first option on them. 

Which raises the question of how they got I Saw Her Standing There. Anyone know? 

This is a long shot, but maybe Capitol had the rights to the version with the full count-in, as Vee-Jay's version omitted "1,2,3" and started on "4".

10 March 2014
9.45am
Avatar
Ron Nasty
"Where have you been?" "I'm not telling you..."
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 4974
Member Since:
17 December 2012
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
273sp_Permalink

meanmistermustard said

Capitol didn't own the US rights to the Please Please Me tracks, and the singles pre-I Want To Hold Your Hand, until winning a lawsuit in '64 and then released it as 'The Early Beatles' - having passed over the songs despite having first option on them. 

Which raises the question of how they got I Saw Her Standing There. Anyone know? 

The simple answer is that they didn't have the rights, but released it anyway. This led to the first lawsuit between Vee-Jay and Capitol, when Vee-Jay sued and Capitol lost. The Vee-Jay/Capitol situation was discussed in another thread.

The following people thank Ron Nasty for this post:

meanmistermustard

"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty

10 March 2014
10.24am
Avatar
meanmistermustard
Moderator



Forum Posts: 17188
Member Since:
1 May 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
274sp_Permalink

mja6758 said

meanmistermustard said

Capitol didn't own the US rights to the Please Please Me tracks, and the singles pre-I Want To Hold Your Hand, until winning a lawsuit in '64 and then released it as 'The Early Beatles' - having passed over the songs despite having first option on them. 

Which raises the question of how they got I Saw Her Standing There. Anyone know? 

The simple answer is that they didn't have the rights, but released it anyway. This led to the first lawsuit between Vee-Jay and Capitol, when Vee-Jay sued and Capitol lost. The Vee-Jay/Capitol situation was discussed in another thread.

I remember most of the VJ/Capitol case, just never thought or remembered about ISHST. 

Don’t make your love suffer insecurities, trade the baggage of self to set another one free. ('Paper Skin' - Kendall Payne)
15 March 2014
2.45am
Avatar
c64wood
Carnegie Hall
Forum Posts: 239
Member Since:
3 September 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Earlier in this thread, I posted that I had the initial release of Capitol Albums Vol.2 that had the incorrect mono versions on Beatles VI and Rubber Soul.  Since the "complete" US Albums were being released I decided not to re-order Capitol Vol.2.  Well, it kept gnawing at me that I had a flawed Beatles release, so I broke down and Ordered Vol.2 again from Amazon.com.  After about a month, they cancelled the order because it was unavailable.  I did find it on Amazon.ca and ordered it.  It arrived yesterday, but had no indication on the wrapper if it was the corrected release.  Popped The Beatles VI into the CD player... 56:16!  Rubber Soul, 59:08!  Checked the false start of, "I'm Looking Through You". Not on mono, but on stereo!  Good to go.

So, tonight I sit here with my glass of red, listening to Capitol Vol. 1 and Vol.2.  I must say that I enjoy the UK as the official canon, but the US releases are nice as singles were included and you don't have to load Past Masters between each album for a few songs. So it's almost in a chronological order minus Capitol's placement of "The Early Beatles".  Guess I should start over and play that one first.

I know you know what you know, but you should know by now that you're not me ~ Ron Nasty
17 March 2014
6.42pm
Avatar
Expert Textpert
In bed.
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2416
Member Since:
18 April 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
No permission to create posts
Forum Timezone: America/Chicago

Most Users Ever Online: 597

Currently Online: Ron Nasty, ewe2
45 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

meanmistermustard: 17188

Ahhh Girl: 10784

Annadog40: 9799

Zig: 7584

parlance: 7092

mr. Sun king coming together: 6980

Mr. Kite: 6092

Silly Girl: 5888

trcanberra: 5552

Ron Nasty: 4974

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 87

Members: 3339

Moderators: 4

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 42

Topics: 3821

Posts: 202664

Newest Members:

SomertonView, Mercury7, babapez, tom_pw, beatlezoe

Moderators: Ahhh Girl: 10784, meanmistermustard: 17188, Zig: 7584, Joe: 4392

Administrators: Joe: 4392, Ellie: 3

Members Birthdays
sp_BirthdayIcon
Today: None
Upcoming: HerMajesty