The Red and Blue Albums | Fab Forum

Introducing the inaugural Fab Forum February Fundraiser! Click here for more details.

Please consider registering
Guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
The Red and Blue Albums
No permission to create posts
25 August 2010
8.35pm
Avatar
Beetle
A terrible pun
Casbah Coffee Club
Forum Posts: 16
Member Since:
7 April 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8 October 2010
6.31pm
julio.cubillo
Cartago, Costa Rica
A Beginning
Forum Posts: 1
Member Since:
21 September 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

For me it has an inner value. Red Album (1962-1966), was the first thing i heard from the boys. And i used to listen to it EVERY SINGLE DAY!!. I remember that was a KCT, and original from Apple that my older brother had steal from a drunken man. Was the only thing Beatle that i heard for years, then when i was about 19 years old y bought "20 Greatest Hits", wich was a revelation for me, because it included "Penny Lane, Hey Jude, Get Back, The Long And Winding Road, and all my Beatle world expanded. But Red Album is always in my heart as the first i had. Years later i bought it on CD.

8 October 2010
8.53pm
Decca
Decca
Forum Posts: 90
Member Since:
29 September 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Beetle said:

So apparently they're remastering the Red and Blue albums, and they'll be released this October. But the burning question is, "Why?". Any opinions on this? I know Apple wants to release something for the holiday season (I guess they're not satisfied with just releasing a bunch of other albums from their catologue), but there are so many other things they should do before this. Let It Be and Magical Mystery Tour on DVD, anyone? Maybe a remastered Anthology set. Or even remastered Live At The BBC. After all of those things are released, then they should remaster Red and Blue. I mean, in my opinion, at least, they're just 2 very big compilation albums.

http://www.thebeatles.com/#/ne.....emastered/


I think mithveaen nailed it.  The 2009 Remasters were purchased by the hardcore and mid-level Beatle fans: the Red and Blue albums are kind of "mop up" if you will to sell to the more casual fans who only like a few songs from each album.  The Anthology series and BBC sessions?  I'd be quite surprised if they remaster those any time in the near future.  They're by their own admission rough around the edges and I'm not sure remastering them would serve to enhance them a whole lot.

BUT, I agree with you 100% that the Let it Be  DVD is waaaaaay overdue for clean-up and remastering into 5.1.   THAT should've been their next release as far as I'm concerned.....man, who's making their "Things to Do" list over there? *smiles!*

a-hard-days-night-ringo-14

 

--Jaxon 

8 October 2010
10.53pm
Avatar
mr. Sun king coming together
Nowhere Land
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 6980
Member Since:
19 September 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Why do you think EMI is rereleasing it

They are Broke

They lost the McCartney Catologue recently and the more Beatles Product they Can Sell the Better

They considered selling Abbey Road they're so Broke

They're shameless little fighters for every dime they can get

They would release the beatles in the shower if it would sell

As if it matters how a man falls down.'

'When the fall's all that's left, it matters a great deal.

8 October 2010
11.25pm
Avatar
Joe
Pepperland
Admin
Forum Posts: 4392
Member Since:
31 March 2008
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Apple Corps has to approve any Beatles release. That's why EMI can't put out random compilations like they did for a while in the 70s and 80s (Rock And Roll Music, Love Songs, Reel Music, etc).

It's true that EMI is broke, and run by an odious man, but I think this is an Apple initiative. Look at what they're doing: Beatles remasters, John Lennon reissues, Band On The Run, much of the non-Beatles back catalogue of Apple Records (Mary Hopkin, Badfinger etc), probably George and Ringo to follow (I'm guessing). We're in the midst of a massive Beatles reissue campaign, and the 090909 releases were only the start of it. And the man behind it isn't EMI's Guy Hands, it's Jeff Jones of Apple.

So, why put out the Red and Blue albums? Well, it's more product. The Beatles only recorded so much, and I'm not sure they want to put out Anthology 4, so they have to look at ways to exploit the back catalogue further. Red/Blue obviously have a place in people's hearts, and they'll sell well. But as Vonbontee pointed out, they could have considered the value for money a bit more.

I won't buy them. Apple don't care. They'll be bought for teenagers who are just discovering the greatest group of all time, or by casual listeners who want a comprehensive best-of to play in the car, take to parties, give as gifts etc. Apart from the single-disc 1, there's nothing else that gives a similar chronological overview of their career.

apple01

Please don't spoil my day; I'm miles away

Can buy me love! Please consider using these links to support the Beatles Bible: Amazon | iTunes

18 October 2010
7.03pm
Avatar
DoctorRobert
Through the bathroom window
Hollywood Bowl
Forum Posts: 399
Member Since:
4 September 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I have a really soft spot for the Blue Album. It was the only Beatles album my parents had, and thus the album I was raised on.

I first found out about the remasters at a bus stop advert, I almost shat myself on seeing my childhood staring back at me.

You all will have read that Dave Dee is no longer with us. But Mickey and Titch and I would like to carry on the good work that's always gone down in number two.
18 October 2010
7.53pm
Avatar
Joe
Pepperland
Admin
Forum Posts: 4392
Member Since:
31 March 2008
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Just published these – feel free to leave a comment:

http://www.beatlesbible.com/al.....red-album/

http://www.beatlesbible.com/al.....lue-album/

I saw a TV advert for the remastered Red/Blue albums last night. I think they'll sell well – they're the perfect Christmas gift for people just getting into The Beatles.

Please don't spoil my day; I'm miles away

Can buy me love! Please consider using these links to support the Beatles Bible: Amazon | iTunes

23 February 2014
5.46pm
Avatar
Into the Sky with Diamonds
New York
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1537
Member Since:
9 August 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Red.

From memory, there were 1 or 2 songs I didn't think belonged on a 'best of' on the blue record. "Old Brown Shoe" comes to mind.

I do think that the Red and Blue were a better idea than "1"

The singles alone don't do the Beatles justice.

In a sense, what the Beatles and/or Capitol did is what we're doing right now in trying to establish the best songs. (See the "Vote Now" thread at the top of the Song section.)

"Into the Sky with Diamonds" (the Beatles and the Race to the Moon – a history)
No permission to create posts
Forum Timezone: America/Chicago

Most Users Ever Online: 597

Currently Online: pepperland, Ron Nasty, trcanberra, Annadog40, Merch, Silly Girl
41 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

meanmistermustard: 17171

Ahhh Girl: 10762

Annadog40: 9782

Zig: 7567

parlance: 7092

mr. Sun king coming together: 6980

Mr. Kite: 6092

Silly Girl: 5846

trcanberra: 5550

Ron Nasty: 4952

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 87

Members: 3336

Moderators: 4

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 42

Topics: 3820

Posts: 202478

Newest Members:

Mercury7, babapez, tom_pw, beatlezoe, nicklav99

Moderators: Ahhh Girl: 10762, meanmistermustard: 17171, Zig: 7567, Joe: 4392

Administrators: Joe: 4392, Ellie: 3

Members Birthdays
sp_BirthdayIcon
Today: DrBeatle
Upcoming: None