The Beatles Bible - Topic: Behold! New! Restored Album Covers! http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/behold-new-restored-album-covers/ Simple:Press Version 5.2.6 The Strawberry on Behold! New! Restored Album Covers! http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/behold-new-restored-album-covers/#p54695 The albums http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/behold-new-restored-album-covers/#p54695 The ones I've posted are removed logos. But others like Sgt. Pepper (which is what I started with), I did't like how Sonny Liston is cut off. As well as adding Gandhi and Leo Gorcey back. I agree there's no point, but in my opinion, some of them bother me. It's also good Photoshop practice.

]]> Thu, 26 Jul 2012 05:46:58 +0100 unknown on Behold! New! Restored Album Covers! http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/behold-new-restored-album-covers/#p54693 The albums http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/behold-new-restored-album-covers/#p54693 That's basically what I was asking, Sun King. I guess he wanted to make them look newer, but they were released fifty years ago. They're not new, and I don't think they look all too different anyways.

]]> Thu, 26 Jul 2012 05:41:13 +0100 mr. Sun king coming together on Behold! New! Restored Album Covers! http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/behold-new-restored-album-covers/#p54690 The albums http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/behold-new-restored-album-covers/#p54690 What's the point? What possible point is there in roving Parlaphone stamps? Why bother? Where's the value to doing this? I need things to make logical sense. This doesn't. Why would someone take the time to adjust the covers and remove perceived blemishes that have become, for better or worse, part of the cover?
I don't object to seeing the covers this way - I just don't see why it matters! What's the logical benefit to restoring the covers, or to viewing them? None. What's the point?

]]> Thu, 26 Jul 2012 05:28:17 +0100 unknown on Behold! New! Restored Album Covers! http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/behold-new-restored-album-covers/#p54689 The albums http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/behold-new-restored-album-covers/#p54689

The Strawberry said
I don't understand your question Unknown.

If they take everything else off of the album covers, then wouldn't that be like messing with them? It's been quite the time since then, so I really don't get it all, that's it.

]]> Thu, 26 Jul 2012 05:19:06 +0100 The Strawberry on Behold! New! Restored Album Covers! http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/behold-new-restored-album-covers/#p54662 The albums http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/behold-new-restored-album-covers/#p54662 Added A Hard Day's Night-Help!

 
From Restored Album Covers
From Restored Album Covers
http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/behold-new-restored-album-covers/#p54615 Thanks. If I remember, tomorrow I'll post A Hard Day's Night.

]]> Tue, 24 Jul 2012 22:47:18 +0100 GeorgeTSimpson on Behold! New! Restored Album Covers! http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/behold-new-restored-album-covers/#p54606 The albums http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/behold-new-restored-album-covers/#p54606 Very good strawberry, better than the original with the beatles cover

]]> Tue, 24 Jul 2012 21:12:01 +0100 The Strawberry on Behold! New! Restored Album Covers! http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/behold-new-restored-album-covers/#p54599 The albums http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/behold-new-restored-album-covers/#p54599 With The Beatles (I fixed it so it looks more like the original, I think you might like it.): 

 
From Restored Album Covers

 Not much different.

 

PS: I forgot that I removed "with Love Me Do and 12 other songs" from Please Please Me. I can add it back in if you want me to.

]]> Tue, 24 Jul 2012 20:18:46 +0100 The Strawberry on Behold! New! Restored Album Covers! http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/behold-new-restored-album-covers/#p54598 The albums http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/behold-new-restored-album-covers/#p54598 I was pretty sure you all would like this one. It's the others I'm worried you'll think I'm ruining famous album art. And I don't understand your question Unknown.

 

I'm about to post the next one (definitely ruins the cover). It'll be in that folder later today.

]]> Tue, 24 Jul 2012 20:13:06 +0100 unknown on Behold! New! Restored Album Covers! http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/behold-new-restored-album-covers/#p54467 The albums http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/behold-new-restored-album-covers/#p54467 Good job with that, Strawberry! The only thing is, if they take everything else off, then how will they know what's not to have?

]]> Sun, 22 Jul 2012 22:20:40 +0100 VictoR3mix on Behold! New! Restored Album Covers! http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/behold-new-restored-album-covers/#p54446 The albums http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/behold-new-restored-album-covers/#p54446 I don't understand what there is to not like about it.

]]> Sun, 22 Jul 2012 13:57:35 +0100 meanmistermustard on Behold! New! Restored Album Covers! http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/behold-new-restored-album-covers/#p54412 The albums http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/behold-new-restored-album-covers/#p54412 I think it looks quite nice without all the writing at the bottom and no logo. I have no idea how anyone could get offended by that.

Thanks Strawberry for the heads up.

]]> Sat, 21 Jul 2012 12:18:08 +0100 The Strawberry on Behold! New! Restored Album Covers! http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/behold-new-restored-album-covers/#p54406 The albums http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/albums/behold-new-restored-album-covers/#p54406 A lot of you won't like these, I don't like some of them myself. But here they are for those of you who do like/want them. I'm going to start with the only one I'm actually proud of.

https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/3-Q53LGB1R4q8VPtjaEDXM9E2goEKSgz1T6TQriP_hI?feat=directlink

 

I felt after almost 50 years, it's about time Parlophone is taken off the cover.

 

"Please Please" don't hurt me if you are offended or just hate it.

]]> Sat, 21 Jul 2012 06:05:42 +0100