The Beatles Bible

The Beatles Bible
The Beatles Bible
  • Share this page:
  • Share
  • Home
  • History
  • Songs
  • Albums
  • Discography
  • People
  • Features
  • Books
  • Map
  • Gallery
  • Fab forum
  • Store
  • Subscribe:
  • RSS icon RSS
  • Email envelope icon Email
  • Twitter icon Twitter
  • Facebook icon Facebook
iTunes & App Store
Home > The Beatles' albums > Let It Be

Let It Be

  • Page 2 of 6
  • « Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • Next »
Buy from Amazon

Let It Be (Remastered)

The Beatles. EMI 2009, Audio CD, $8.99

Once they started work on the Get Back project, it became clear to The Beatles that their collective enthusiasm was low. John Lennon was addicted to heroin and rarely enthused by the sessions, and arguments among the group eventually led to George Harrison temporarily leaving the band.

At the time The Beatles were exhausted after spending five months recording the White Album, and had also worked on Apple projects by James Taylor, Mary Hopkin, Jackie Lomax and solo works. At Twickenham they were forced to keep to film industry schedules, which involved starting work at 8.30am each day.

The cameras were kept rolling at all times, and captured the strains and tensions of this fragile period. However, there were many moments of true inspiration, and The Beatles' humour and warmth for one another was often evident.

There was some amazing stuff - their humour got to me as much as the music, and I didn't stop laughing for six weeks. John Lennon only had to walk in a room, and I'd just crack up. Their whole mood was wonderful, and that was the thing, and there was all this nonsense going on at the time about the problems surrounding the group, and the press being at them, and in fact, there they were, just doing it, having a wonderful time and being incredibly funny, and none of that's in the film.
Glyn Johns
The Record Producers

In the studio

The Beatles performed partial or complete versions of literally hundreds of cover versions and original songs in January 1969. These ranged from traditional songs and rock and roll classics to unreleased works-in-progress and those that eventually appeared on Let It Be, Abbey Road, and The Beatles' early solo albums. Among them were versions of Love Me Do, Child Of Nature, Something, Don't Let Me Down, All Things Must Pass, songs by Chuck Berry, Buddy Holly, Bob Dylan, George Formby, The Beach Boys and others, as well as blues-based improvisations, aimless jams, off-the-cuff song sketches and many hours of dialogue.

The Beatles worked at Twickenham from 2-14 January 1969. On 10 January George Harrison quit the band, after separate disagreements with John Lennon and Paul McCartney.

For me, to come back into the winter of discontent with The Beatles in Twickenham was very unhealthy and unhappy. But I can remember feeling quite optimistic about it. I thought, 'OK, it's the New Year and we have a new approach to recording.' I think the first couple of days were OK, but it was soon quite apparent that it was just the same as it had been when we were last in the studio, and it was going to be painful again. There was a lot of trivia and games being played.

As everybody knows, we never had much privacy - and now they were filming us rehearsing. One day there was a row going on between Paul and me. It's actually in the film: you can see where he's saying, 'Well, don't play this,' and I'm saying, 'I'll play whatever you want me to play, or I won't play at all if you don't want me to play. Whatever it is that will please you, I'll do it...'

They were filming us having a row. It never came to blows, but I thought, 'What's the point of this? I'm quite capable of being relatively happy on my own and I'm not able to be happy in this situation. I'm getting out of here.'

Everybody had gone through that. Ringo had left at one point. I know John wanted out. It was a very, very difficult, stressful time, and being filmed having a row as well was terrible. I got up and I thought, 'I'm not doing this any more. I'm out of here.'

George Harrison
Anthology

After Harrison walked out of the Twickenham rehearsals, the other three Beatles carried on performing without him. At one point Yoko Ono wailed some vocals over their jamming. John Lennon can be heard on the tapes suggesting that if Harrison didn't return within a few days they should replace him with Eric Clapton.

George left because Paul and he were having a heated discussion. They weren't getting on that day and George decided to leave, but he didn't tell John or me or Paul. There'd been some tension going down in the morning, and arguments would go on anyway, so none of us realised until we went to lunch that George had gone home. When we came back he still wasn't there, so we started jamming violently. Paul was playing his bass into the amp and John was off, and I was playing some weird drumming that I hadn't done before. I don't play like that as a rule. Our reaction was really, really interesting at the time. And Yoko jumped in, of course; she was there.
Ringo Starr
Anthology

Harrison was persuaded to rejoin on 15 January, during a five-hour meeting in which he insisted he would only rejoin if the idea of a live show was dropped. He also demanded that sessions be moved from Twickenham to a new studio in the basement of Apple's headquarters in Savile Row, London. He didn't object to The Beatles being filmed making their album, and his conditions didn't rule out a live performance for the cameras.

I was called to a meeting out in Elstead in Surrey, at Ringo’s house that he bought from Peter Sellers. It was decided that it would be better if we got back together and finished the record. Twickenham Studios were very cold and not a very nice atmosphere, so we decided to abandon that and go to Savile Row into the recording studio.
George Harrison
Anthology
  • Share this page:
  • Share
  • Page 2 of 6
  • « Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • Next »
Related articles:

  • Mixing, editing: Get Back LP
  • Mixing, master compilation: Let It Be, Get Back LP
  • Mixing: The Long And Winding Road, Let It Be
  • Mixing: Get Back, Teddy Boy, Two Of Us, Dig A Pony, I've Got A Feeling, The Long And Winding Road, Let It Be, Rocker, Save The Last Dance For Me, Don't Let Me Down, For You Blue, The Walk
  • Glyn Johns compiles the second Get Back LP

26 responses to “Let It Be”

  1. antoni says:
    Wednesday 16 September 2009 at 12.34pm

    Let It Be, Naked or Not has two of Paul's most long winded and nail scrapes aganst the blacboard. After seeing Anthology this past week, i forgot how he was the most annoying of the Beatles. Let It Be and Long and Winding Road could have ended a lot soone, but no, the camera's were rolling. Let It Be was a recording of the breakup of a band and these two songs were the blueprint.

    Reply to this comment
    • Beatlesguru says:
      Wednesday 19 January 2011 at 12.00am

      If you don't like Paul McCartney then you don't like the Beatles. Let it Be and Long and Winding Road are too of Paul's masterpieces -as well as being two of the best songs on the Album. Really silly post..

      Reply to this comment
  2. Amphion says:
    Monday 7 December 2009 at 3.57pm

    Being brand spanking new to this particular Beatles site, I was just fixing a whole wear the rain gets in, when I suddenly found meself wonderin', In 2003 there was mention that the Let It Be film was about to be released. This film was last screened on British BBC2, Television in about 1982. A Saturday, If I recall... But is it any closer to being released. Any ideas???

    Reply to this comment
    • Matt says:
      Thursday 31 December 2009 at 4.52am

      Engineers started remastering the film a while back but decided the film was too "controversial". Paul and Ringo do not want it released either. I doubt it will be released any time soon, especially during Paul, Ringo, Yoko Ono and Olivia Harrison's lifetimes.

      Reply to this comment
  3. TheOneBeatle says:
    Thursday 21 January 2010 at 5.54am

    The whole album and sessions and film and all is so polemic!

    Reply to this comment
  4. robert says:
    Sunday 2 May 2010 at 3.31am

    Here's why LIB doesn't work for me - and this may be picky but here goes: because it is supposed to be the soundtrack to a movie and was intended to replicate the feel of live performances, the problem I have is this - listen through head phones and notice how many times John's voice is on one side and his guitar is on the other side.

    This completely wrecks the feel of a live performance. At least for me.

    Sorry I can't help but notice it.

    Does anyone know if Paul fixed this on LIBN - I don't have that CD.

    Reply to this comment
    • Joe says:
      Wednesday 5 May 2010 at 6.24pm

      It shouldn't really make a difference. With multitrack recording, a live performance can be taped with simultaneously-played instruments routed to different tracks, which can then be mixed to different parts of the stereo spectrum. Of course, that's not to say that all of the LIB performances were live - there were a number of overdubs added once they'd thrown the 'live' concept out of the window.

      Reply to this comment
  5. McLerristarr says:
    Saturday 8 May 2010 at 3.25pm

    "marked a move away from The Beatles' elaborate studio experimentation of 1966 and 1967, with a return to more straightforward rock and roll, and the White Album and much of the Yellow Submarine soundtrack had followed in a similar vein."

    I wouldn't say much of the Yellow Submarine soundtrack was back to basics. There were 13 songs: 2 were repeats from previous albums/singles, 7 were George Martin's orchestra songs, 2 were George Harrison's songs neither of which sound back to basics, so that leaves 2 new Lennon-McCartney songs which could be called back to basics.

    And certainly not all the White Albums was back to basics – Revolution 9, Wild Honey Pie.

    Reply to this comment
    • Joe says:
      Sunday 9 May 2010 at 2.36pm

      I was referring to the 'new' songs on the YS soundtrack, though it probably needs clarifying. Certainly Hey Bulldog and All Together Now were a step away from their sound of 1967, though the George Harrison songs clearly aren't.

      As for the White Album, you're right that there were some complex recordings on there, but nothing like to the same degree of Sgt Pepper or Strawberry Fields Forever. Much of it is fairly straightforward, thought with liberal doses of Beatles magic.

      Reply to this comment
  6. McLerristarr says:
    Saturday 8 May 2010 at 5.35pm

    "And, let us not forget, even if the collection wasn't The Beatles' best, for many lesser bands these songs would have constituted a career peak."

    Couldn't agree more. When fans always talk about this isn't good or whatever, what we really mean is compared to The Beatles' other stuff it isn't as good, but it is still amazing.

    Reply to this comment
  7. robert says:
    Monday 10 May 2010 at 1.56am

    Sorry Joe, but it does matter whether lennon's voalcs and guitar are on the same stereo pan.

    of course multitracking makes it possible to put an instrument and/or vocal anywhere in the spectrum, but that doesn't make it "work".

    Even though the beatles abandoned the actual "live" recording technique, they still marketed and presented the album as a live experience - to go with the movie.

    The intended feel of the record is to experience a live beatles performance (even if it wasn't). So it's an anomaly to have a musician's voice separated from his instrument.

    Of course perhaps I'm just too sensitive.

    Reply to this comment
  8. Deadman says:
    Tuesday 11 May 2010 at 12.28am

    With electric instruments and microphones and amplifiers, modern live music often features "a musician's voice separated from his instrument"; it is not anomalous.

    Reply to this comment
  9. Zig says:
    Tuesday 11 May 2010 at 7.59pm

    Even though this LP features my least favorite Beatles song, I still enjoy the heck out of it - Spectorized or not. In fact, I wish all of the songs on it were recorded "live" on the roof top. It would have been very refreshing to hear a live Beatles recording without the screaming.

    As an aside, I get a kick out of the Spector quote on page 5 of this article. I'm by no means a fan of his, but it's the first time I've seen his defense in print. It's actually pretty funny.

    Reply to this comment
    • Joe says:
      Wednesday 12 May 2010 at 9.43am

      Yes, I love that quote. I used it on the Phil Spector profile as well.

      Reply to this comment
  10. Festival Days Off says:
    Thursday 27 May 2010 at 3.37pm

    Dear all,

    We would like to inform you about the following event :

    LET IT BE live / The Beatles
    by Yael Naim, Mathias Malzieu, Cocoon, Loney Dear, David Donatien, Camille O’Sullivan, Sense of Sound Singers,…

    Paris (France), July 4th, Salle Pleyel

    For the 40th anniversary of the release of the album Let It Be, David Coulter, who has collaborated with artists like Damon Albarn, Tom Waits and Marianne Faithfull, unites a young generation of European musicians to reinterpret the Beatles' last album.

    http://www.citedelamusique.fr/minisites/1007_daysoff/concert/en_let_it_be_live.aspx

    Reply to this comment
  11. Frank says:
    Saturday 28 August 2010 at 6.29pm

    I believe Paul made a mistake. He did allow female voices in their records. Yoko sang in The Continuing Story Of Bungalow Bill, and Yoko again along with Patti Harrison in Birthday. His wife Linda provided background vocals for Let It Be.

    Reply to this comment
    • vonbontee says:
      Monday 30 August 2010 at 7.47am

      Yeah, and there was also the female choir in "Walrus" - and howbout those two Apple scruffs that Paul himself invited to sing on "Across The Universe"! He was either being wilfully obtuse, or exaggerating, or he had a terrible memory. (And the amount of dope he smoked would suggest the latter.) :-)

      Reply to this comment
    • Tim E says:
      Thursday 2 February 2012 at 12.52am

      Pretty sure Paul meant a female singing lead

      Reply to this comment
  12. robert says:
    Saturday 28 August 2010 at 11.12pm

    and wasn't there an entire choir on Good Night?

    Reply to this comment
  13. vonbontee says:
    Monday 30 August 2010 at 3.27pm

    Ooh right, good catch!

    Reply to this comment
  14. Jeff says:
    Saturday 27 November 2010 at 4.46pm

    LIB is both fantastic and disappointing. Eventhough substandard by usual Beatle standards, the songs are worthy and hold up against anything other artists put out at the same time (hell, for the next 40 years for that matter!). It was a disappointment in that it actually could have been far, far better. The Beatles are openly apathetic on LIB. Also, George's growth as a songwriter could have (had he been allowed to contribute more songs)partly made-up for John's growing indifference, dwindling song contributions and a seeming drop in the quality of his contributions. All Things Must Pass absolutely deserved to have been properly recorded and included on LIB (and NOT in place of, but in addition to, For You Blue and I Me Mine). It is no wonder why George walked out during these sessions and became hesitant to work as a Beatle ever again. What a pity (which reminds us that Harrison's brilliant song Isn't It A Pity was another in a list of George composed tunes rejected for Beatle records by John, Paul and/or George Martin). Thankfully, George recorded these on his own after the group's dissoluion.

    Reply to this comment
    • Julio says:
      Monday 18 April 2011 at 4.26pm

      It is funny that people think of John towards end as not writing much but he was actually very creative and writing a ton. He just did not want to write for the beatles. Look at his first two solo albums Plastic Ono Band and Imagine, they are full fledged releases. Paul's first solo albums while they are charming and having their bits (and the masterpiece 'Maybe Im Amazed) are bit rough and incomplete.

      Reply to this comment
  15. Clemenza08 says:
    Sunday 18 September 2011 at 4.04pm

    This is not a Beatle album, is just a Spector work... A Spector album, soloist, taking the tapes and the band's name...

    Reply to this comment
    • mr. Sun king coming together says:
      Monday 19 September 2011 at 9.53pm

      Adding orchestra to a quarter of an album, while not doing anything else of his typical way isn't bad. It's called doing what you're asked.

      Reply to this comment
  16. rover says:
    Thursday 15 December 2011 at 6.20pm

    I think Phil Spector is treated unfairly when it comes to LIB. He had the unenviable task of wading through hours of recordings and make something of it--all with virtually no input for the band. The only sin Spector committed was not being George Martin. Martin is tasteful and understated; Spector (on all his works) is melodramatic and over-the-top. Spector simply delivered a Spector production. Lennon was reportedly happy with it. I have little patience for McCartney's complaints. A bit like crying over spilt milk.

    Reply to this comment
    • Joe says:
      Friday 16 December 2011 at 10.12am

      Actually I don't think Spector did wade through that many hours of tapes. Most of the selection and filtering was done by Glyn Johns prior to Spector arriving.

      When Spector began work he hit the ground running, completing his work in a matter of days (he needed just seven recording and mixing sessions in March and April 1970), with George Harrison and Allen Klein apparently present for most of the sessions. Ringo Starr even played on one.

      Reply to this comment

Leave a reply

Please note that there may be a delay before comments can be approved for publication. We reserve the right to edit for length and/or content. Comments not in the English language may be discarded, and offensive, irrelevant or spam ones will be ignored. For more information please read the full comments policy.
Click here to cancel reply.


  • Latest posts

    • Paul McCartney to headline Queen's diamond jubilee concert
    • US album release: Kisses On The Bottom by Paul McCartney
    • UK album release: Kisses On The Bottom by Paul McCartney
    • Abbey Road to offer studio time to wealthy hotel guests
    • US publishing rights for six early Beatles songs are sold
    • Paul McCartney live at Echo Arena, Liverpool
    • Paul McCartney live at Manchester Evening News Arena, Manchester
    • Paul McCartney live at Olimpiyskiy Arena, Moscow, Russia
    • Paul McCartney live at Hartwall Areena, Helsinki, Finland
    • Paul McCartney live at Ericsson Globe Arena, Stockholm, Sweden
  • On this day in Beatles history

    • 1967: Recording: Fixing A Hole
    • 1964: The Beatles' first Ed Sullivan Show
    • 1963: Live: Empire Theatre, Sunderland
    • 1961: Live: The Beatles' first Cavern Club show

    Want more? Visit the Beatles history section.

  • Twitter updates

  • Things we said today

    • The Walrus on UK EP release: All My Loving
    • David Roof on The Beatles' mono and stereo remasters are released
    • richard hubbard on The Beatles' American invasion begins
    • tom watt on You Can't Do That
    • tom watt on I Just Don't Understand
  • From the forum

    • Did John have any disorders?

      posted in forum John Lennon  by The Strawberry

    • Why is George under-appreciated?

      posted in forum George Harrison  by The Strawberry

    • The Walrus Costume

      posted in forum Yesterday... and today  by The Strawberry

    • Chord Structure

      posted in forum Recording and musicology  by Rat Salad

    • Something

      posted in forum The songs  by Happiness is a warm gun

  • In the gallery

    japan_youre_going_to_lose_that_girl_ep The Beatles at Tittenhurst Park, 22 August 1969 france_beatles_65 The Beatles with the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, 1967
  • Translator

  • Beatles for sale

  • Top Ten Club

    • Fab forum
    • The Beatles' songs
    • Beatles photo gallery
    • The Beatles and drugs
    • Kisses On The Bottom
    • Days in the life: The Beatles' history
    • The Beatles' albums
    • The Beatles' first Ed Sullivan Show
    • The Beatles' American invasion begins
    • The Abbey Road cover photography session
  • Can buy me love

    The Beatles Bible is run for the love of anything and everything to do with The Beatles. If you've learned something new about the band and wish to show your appreciation, why not make a small donation via PayPal? It'll help with server costs, Beatles books etc...
  • Thinking of linking

    • thebeatles.com
    • johnlennon.com
    • paulmccartney.com
    • twitter.com/paulmccartney
    • paulmccartneyofficial.tumblr.com
    • georgeharrison.com
    • twitter.com/GeorgeHarrison
    • ringostarr.com
    • applerecords.com
      Beatles Bible logo by Yer Logos/The Beatles In 3D
  • Come together

    This site is in no way associated with or endorsed by The Beatles, Apple Corps Ltd, associated organisations or any members of The Beatles or their representatives. It is intended as a tribute to the greatest group of all time, to try - in a small way - to help introduce their music to new generations of fans.

© 2008-2012 The Beatles Bible. All rights reserved. | Contact us | About this site | Privacy policy | Words of love: 1,110,260

Top of page

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.